How Student Characteristics Affect Economy Students’ Digital Competences: A latent profile study

  • Lydia Schulze Heuling Western Norway University of Applied Science, Norway
  • Steffen Wild Heidelberg School of Education, Heidelberg University, Germany
Keywords: digital competences, DigComp, co-op students, latent profile analysis, business school


The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) profoundly impacts in- dustry and work. It therefore is important for vocational education and training to em- phasize on the development of digital competences. However, we still know very little about how these skills are distributed among students in vocational education and train- ing (VET) in general, and the so-called ‘cooperative study programmes’ (CSP) in parti- cular. CSPs combine vocational education components with university coursework lead- ing up to a journeymen certificate and an academic degree simultaneously. This study analyses the digital competences of first-year students in a business-focussed CSP at the Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DHBW) in Germany, using a Ger- man version (the D21-Index) of the European framework for digital competences (DigComp) to assess students’ competence levels. A latent profile analysis revealed four competence profiles (reserved digitised, reserved appreciative, constructive digitised, and reflective digitised). Interestingly, our subsequent analysis showed that none of the student characteristics we assessed turned out to be distinctive for any of the four pro- files. Considerations of relevant inset points for VET institutions nationally and interna- tionally to develop tailored support of digital competence development of their students are integrated in the conclusions.


Baas, M., & Baethge, M. (2017). Entwicklung der Berufsausbildung in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Bertelsmann.

Bacher, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Analyse latenter Klassen. In C. Wolf, & H. Best (Eds.), Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse (pp. 553‒574). Springer. DOI:

Balsmeier, B., & Woerter, M. (2019). Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction. Research Policy, 48(8). DOI:

Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. Lord, & M. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Addison-Wesley.

Boechler, P., Leenaars, L., & Levner, I. (2008). Recreational vs. educational computer experience: Predicting explicit and implicit learning outcomes during a website search. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2499–2501). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Braunstein, L. A., Takei, H., Wang F., & Loken, M. K. (2011). Benefits of cooperative and work-integrated education for employers. In R. K. Coll, & K. E. Zegwaard (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative and work-integrated education: International perspectives of theory, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 277–286). World Association for Cooperative Education.

Browne, M. W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 108–132. DOI:

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. Norton & Company.

Burchert, J., & Schulte, S. (2014). Die Nutzung des Internets in der dualen Ausbildung: Eine berufspädagogische Betrachtung auf Basis empirischer Forschungsergebnisse. Peter Lang.

Canchu L., & Louisa, H. (2009). Subcultures and use of communication information technology in higher education institutions. Journal Higher Education, 80(5), 564–590. DOI:

Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press.

Coll, R., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2011). International handbook for cooperative and work- integrated education: International perspectives of theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). World Association for Cooperative Education (WACE).

Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320–334. DOI:

Davaki, K. (2018). The underlying causes of the digital gender gap and possible solutions for enhanced digital inclusion of women and girls: Study for the European Parliament's Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from

De Witt, C. (2012). Neue Lernformen für die berufliche Bildung: Mobile learning – Social learning – Game based learning. Zeitschrift des Bundesinstituts für Berufsbildung, 41(3), 6–9.

DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 307–336. DOI:

Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training. (2018). Datenreport zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2018: Informationen und Analysen zur Entwicklung der beruflichen Bildung. Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training.

Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2018). Berufsbildungsbericht 2018. Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Ferrari, A. (2013). DigComp: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. In Y. Punie, & B. N. Brecko (Eds.), JRC scientific and policy reports (pp. 4–45). Publications Office of the European Union.

Geiser, C. (2010). Datenanalyse mit Mplus. Springer. DOI:

Goldhammer, F., Gniewosy, G., & Zylka, J. (2006). ICT engagement in learning environments. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing Contexts of Learning (pp. 331‒351). Springer.

Gollwitzer, M. (2012). Latent-class-analysis. In H. Moosbrugger, & A. Kelava (Eds.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (2nd ed., pp. 553‒574). Springer. DOI:

Graf, L. (2013). The hybridization of vocational training and higher education in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Budrich UniPress Ltd.

Graf, L., Powell, J. J. W., Fortwengel, J., Bernhard, N., & Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst. (2014). Dual study programmemes in global context: Internationalisation in Germany and transfer to Brazil, France, Qatar, Mexico and the US. DAAD.

Greene, J. A., Seung, B. Y., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55‒69. DOI:

Hatlevik, O., Ottestad, G., & Throndsen, I. (2015). Predictors of digital competence in 7th grade: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Archive, 31(3), 220–231. DOI:

Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 935. DOI:

Haukås, M., & Skjervheim, K. (2018). Vocational education and training in Europe: Norway. Cedefop ReferNet VET in Europe reports. Retrieved December 2, 2020, from

Hofmann, S., Hemkes, B., Joyce, S. L., König, M., & Kutzner, P. (2019). AusbildungPlus in Zahlen: Duales Studium 2019. Trends und Analysen. Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung.

Hu, Y., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. DOI:

Kaarakainen, M. T., Kivinen, A., & Kaarakainen, S. S. (2017). Differences between the genders in ICT skills for Finnish upper comprehensive school students: Does gender matter? International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 13(2), 1–16.

Kämäräinen, P., Gerrard, A., & Müller, W. (2019). Strategies and training models for promoting digital competences in the field of vocational education and training: Reflections on policies, conceptual frameworks and innovation projects. In B. E. Stalder, & C. Nägele (Eds.), Trends in vocational education and training research, Vol. II: Proceedings of the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Vocational Education and Training Network (VETNET) (pp. 179– 197). VETNET.

Kramer, J., Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Jonkmann, K., Maaz, K., & Treptow, R. (2011). High class students in the universities, the rest in the other institutions of higher education: How students of different college types differ. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14, 465–487. DOI:

Künsting, J., Billich-Knapp, M., & Lipowsky, F. (2012). Profile der Anforderungsbewältigung zu Beginn des Lehramtsstudiums. Journal for Educational Research Online, 4(2), 84‒119.

Kupfer, F. (2013). Duale Studiengänge aus Sicht der Betriebe: Praxisnahes Erfolgsmodell durch Bestenauslese. Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis – BWP, 47(4), 25–29.

Kurz, C., & Rieger, F. (2013). Arbeitsfrei: Eine Entdeckungsreise zu den Maschinen, die uns ersetzen. Riemann.

Lucas, R. E., & Baird, B. M. (2006). Global self-assessment. In M. Eid, & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 29–42). American Psychological Association. DOI:

Mc Cullough, C., Smirli, E., Ward, T., Harrison, T., & Massy, J. (2002). eLearning und Ausbildung in Europa: Umfrage zum Einsatz von eLearning zur beruflichen Aus- und Weiterbildung in der Europäischen Union. Cedefop.

Mancy, R. (2007). Implicit learning and computer programming [Dissertation]. University of Glasgow.

Müller, L.-S., Stecher, B., Dathe, R., Boberach, M., Exel, S., & Baethge, C. B. (2018). D21 Digitalindex 2017/2018: Jährliches Lagebild zur digitalen Gesellschaft. Retrieved May 1, 2019, from

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus version user guide. Retrieved September 2, 2019, from uide%20v6.pdf

Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 85–100. DOI:

Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 8‒47. DOI:

Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. (2018). Theorizing digital divide. Routledge. Reinhard, K., & Pogrzeba, A. (2016). Comparative cooperative education: Evaluating Thai models on work-integrated learning, using the German Duale Hochschule Baden-Wuerttemberg model as a benchmark. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(3), 227–247.

Reinhard, K., Pogrzeba, A., Townsend, R., & Pop, A. P. (2016). A comparative study of cooperative education and work integrated learning in Germany, South Africa, and Namibia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(3), 249–263.

Rowsell, J., Morrell, E., & Alvermann, D. E. (2017). Confronting the digital divide: Debunking brave new world discourses. The Reading Teacher, 71(2), 157‒165. DOI:

Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The relation between students’ socioeconomic status and ICT literacy: Findings from a meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 138, 49–58. DOI:

Schulze Heuling, L. (2017). Does intra-institutional communication work? How educational players can provide a tailored environment for their vocational apprentices: An interview study. Unpublished data.

Schulze Heuling, L. (2018). Cross-border experiences in ICT-related vocational education between Denmark and Germany: An interview study. Unpublished data.

Schulze Heuling, L., Wild, S., & Vest, A. (submitted). Digital competences of prospective science teachers and engineers: A latent profile and correspondence analysis.

Seeber, S., & Seifried, J. (2019). Challenges and development prospects for vocational education and training in times of changing socioeconomic and technological conditions. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 22, 485–508. DOI:

Senkbeil, M., Ihme, J. M., & Schöber, C. (2019). Are first-semester and advanced university students ready for life and work in the digital world? Results of a standard setting method to describe ICT-related proficiency levels. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 22(6), 1359–1384. DOI:

Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205–217. DOI:

Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past: A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 19, 58‒84. DOI:

Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58. DOI:

Smith, J. K., Given, L. M., Julien, H., Ouellette, D., & DeLong, K. (2013). Information literacy proficiency: Assessing the gap in high school students’ readiness for undergraduate academic work. Library & Information Science Research, 35(2), 88–96. DOI:

Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg. (2016). Ergebnisse der Absolventenbefragung 2013 an der Dualen Hochschule in Baden-Württemberg: Absolventinnen und Absolventen der Prüfungsjahre 2008 und 2011. Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg.

Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. (2012). Country profile Sweden. Retrieved March 24, 2020, from 18-3/sweden_country_profile_30141CE0-E643-5AC4- 511FC13CBA34A32C_49456.pdf

Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. F. (2013). Using mulitvariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Tadesse T, Gillies R. M., & Campbell, C. (2018). Assessing the dimensionality and educational impacts of integrated ICT literacy in the higher education context. Australian Journal for Educational Technology, 34(1), 88–101. DOI:

Undervisningsministeriet. (2019). Idekatalog fra eud/eux-elevpanelet [Suggestions from the euc/eux-student panel]. Retrieved December 2, 2020, from idekatalog-fra-eud-eux-elevpanel.pdf

Weich, M., Kramer, J., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2017). Beginning university: Dual or conventional? Differences in study entry requirements for beginning undergraduates in dual and non-dual study programmes at Bavarian universities of applied sciences. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20, 305–332. DOI:

Wild, S., & Neef, C. (2019). The role of academic major and academic year for self- determined motivation in cooperative education. Industry and Higher Education, 33(5), 327–339. DOI:

Wild, S., & Schulze Heuling, L. (2020a, online first). Student dropout and retention: An event history analysis among students in cooperative higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 104. DOI:

Wild, S., & Schulze Heuling, L. (2020b). How do the digital competences of students in vocational schools differ from those of students in cooperative higher education institutions in Germany? Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 12(5), 1–18. DOI:

Wild, S., & Schulze Heuling, L. (2021). Re-evaluation of the D21-Digital-Index assessment instrument for measuring higher-level digital competences. Stud- ies in Educational Evaluation, accepted. DOI:

Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. Routledge. Wolter, A. (2016). Der Ort des dualen Studiums zwischen beruflicher und akademischer Bildung: Mythen und Realitäten. In U. Faßhauer, & E. Severing (Eds.), Verzahnung beruflicher und akademische Bildung: Duale Studiengänge in Theorie und Praxis (pp. 39–60). Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training.

How to Cite
Schulze Heuling, L., & Wild, S. (2021). How Student Characteristics Affect Economy Students’ Digital Competences: A latent profile study. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 44-70.
Peer-reviewed research articles