A Taxonomy for Teaching Transfer Skills in the Danish VET System

  • Vibe Aarkrog Aarhus Universitet, Danmark
Keywords: transfer, Danish VET system

Abstract

The article deals with transfer in the dual Danish VET system. Transfer is defined as the process of applying knowledge and skills acquired in an educational situation to working life. The existence of many identical elements in both training and transfer situations is known as ‘near transfer‘, and is most readily achieved when training is conducted within company premises. Students find the relevance of their theoretical training to in-company-based application highly motivating. Cognitively, transfer is facilitated by the concrete similarities between training and its application. However, the purpose of school-based education is to develop the students’ mastery of ‘far transfer‘, i.e., their ability to apply knowledge and skills to a broad range of situations. Therefore the pedagogy of VET should provide a progression from near to far transfer. The aim of this article is to describe and discuss some of the pedagogical challenges for VET of near and far transfer.

References

Author. (2004). Transfer in interactive processes. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Learning in Working Life (pp. 163-176). Frederiksberg Roskilde University Press.


Author (2005). Learning in the workplace and the significance of school-based education. Examples from a study of learning in a Danish vocational education and training programme. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(2), 137-147. DOI: 10.1080/02601370500056268


Author. (2008a). Current Challenges in the Danish dual VET curricula. Vocal, 7, 49-57.


Author  (2008b). Det hjælper ikke at være i værkstedet, når man skal lære areal og rumfang. Cursiv (3), 127-141.


Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, A. J. (2002). When and Where Do We apply What We Learn? A Taxonomy for Far Transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612


Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training Transfer: An integrative Literature Review. Human Resource Development Review., 6(3), 34. DOI: 10.1177/1534484307303035


Busch, T. (1993). Overføring av læring: afhandling for graden dr. oecon., Trondheim Økonomiske Høgskole.


Detterman, D. K. (1993). The Case for Prosecution: Transfer as an Epiphenomenon. In D. K. S. Detterman, R.J. (Ed.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction. (pp. 1-24.). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.


Ellis, H. C. (1965). The Transfer of Learning. New York: The Macmillan Company.


Haskell, R. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: cognition, instruction and reasoning. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/b978-012330595-4/50003-2


Holyak, K. J. K., K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332-340. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197035


Judd, C. H. (1908). The Relation of Special Training to General Intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28-42.


Kontoghioghes, C. (2002). Predicting motivation to learning and motivation to transfer learning back to the job in a service organisation: A new systematic model for training affectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 114-129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.2002.tb00259.x


Kontoghiorghes, C. (1998). Training Transfer as it Relates to the Instructional system and the Broader work Environment. Paper presented at the Transfer of Learning. Concurrent symposium Session at AHRD Annual Conference, Illinois.


Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355


Persson, J. (1995). Kontekstens betydning for transfer. Handelsskolen, København.


Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.


S. Yamnill, G. N. M. (2001). Theories supporting transfer of training. . Human Ressource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 195-208. DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.7


Støttrup Jensen, H. (1994). Skole-virksomhedssamspillet: Resumé af projektrapporter. (No. ESA projekt nr. 2128 og 3213): SEL.


Tanggaard, L. (2007). Learning at school and learning at work: Application, reflection and/ or boundary crossing. In C. H. Jørgensen & V. Aarkrog Eds.), Divergence and Convergence in Education and Work. Bern: Peter Lang.


Tennant, M. (1999). Is learning transferable? In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding Learning at Work. London: Routledge.


Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function Upon the Efficiency of Other Functions. The Psychological Review, VIII(3), 247-261.


Washington, C. L. (2000). Influencing process change: Understandig the role of learning transfer climate, self-efficacy, and goal commitment. Ohio: Ohio State University, Workforce Development and Education Section.


Winters, A., Meijers, F., Kuijpers, M., & Baert, H. (2009). What are vocational training conversations abotut? Analysis of vocational training conversations in Dutch vocational education from a career learning perspective. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61(3), 247-266. DOI: 10.1080/13636820903194690


Yamnill, S., & McLean, G. N. (2001). Theories supporting transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 195-208. DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.7

Published
2011-05-12
How to Cite
Aarkrog, V. (2011). A Taxonomy for Teaching Transfer Skills in the Danish VET System. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.11v1i1a5
Section
Peer-reviewed research articles