Forest machine operator students’ experiences of simulation-based learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.261636Keywords:
simulation-based learning, learning experience, students, skills training, forest machine operating, guidanceAbstract
Simulation-based learning (SBL) is widely used in different contexts where the purpose is to learn and train professional skills. The aim of this qualitative study was to examine forest machine operator students’ meaningful learning experiences of skills training and performance, and guidance from the teacher and the simulator in a SBL session. Six operator students completed four tasks using the simulator under the teacher’s guidance. After the SBL session, the students watched the screenshot videos of the tasks, annotated meaningful learning experiences, and were interviewed about them. A thematic analysis was used. The findings showed that learning experiences of skills training and performance were mainly described through errors, whereas successes were rarely mentioned. The teacher’s guidance was perceived as advice and feedback which were considered useful and supportive for the learning and developing professional skills. The simulator’s guidance was also characterised through advice and feedback, but these were perceived as overly strict. The findings suggest that the teacher’s support is needed particularly in the initial phase of simulation training. It is important to foster the development of operator students’ self-assessment skills and to encourage them to be active and responsible in their learning of new skills in SBL sessions.References
Aebersold, M. (2016). The history of simulation and its impact on the future. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016436
Allerton, D. J. (2010). The impact of flight simulation in aerospace. The Aeronautical Journal, 114(1162), 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000004231
Bergamo, P. A. d. S., Streng, E. S., de Carvalho, M. A., Rosenkranz, J., & Ghorbani, Y. (2022). Simulation-based training and learning: A review on technology-enhanced education for the minerals industry. Minerals Engineering, 175, 107272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107272
Billett, S. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171302237202
Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. Springer Science & Business Media.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burk, E., Han, H. S., Smidt, M., & Fox, B. (2023). Effectiveness of simulator training compared to machine training for equipment operators in the logging industry. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 34(3), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2023.2194751
Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 21–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02474.x
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
Cook, D. A., Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., Erwin, P. J., & Hatala, R. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 35(1), e867–e898. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
Dieckmann, P., Molin Friis, S., Lippert, A., & Østergaard, D. (2009). The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice. Medical Teacher, 31(7), e287–e294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590902866218
Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/20211/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
Gellerstedt, S. (2002). Operation of the single-grip harvester: Motor-sensory and cognitive work. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 13(2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2002.10702461
Goode, N., Salmon, P. M., & Lenné, M. G. (2013). Simulation-based driver and vehicle crew training: Applications, efficacy and future directions. Applied Ergonomics, 44(3), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.007
Husebø, S.E., Dieckmann, P., Rystedt, H., Søreide, E., & Friberg, F. (2013). The relationship between facilitators’ questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 8(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5c
Häggström, C. (2015). Human factors in mechanized cut-to-length forest operations (Publication No. 59) [Doctoral dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences]. https://res.slu.se/id/publ/67031
Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Boshuizen, H. (2018). Learning in workplace simulations in vocational education: A student perspective. Vocations and Learning, 11(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-017-9186-7
Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D. R., & Miller, R. (1963). Stimulated recall in therapy using video tape: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045497
Kneebone, R. (2005). Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: A theory-based approach. Academic Medicine, 80(6), 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200506000-00006
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Kolbe, M., Eppich, W., Rudolph, J., Meguerdichian, M., Catena, H., Cripps, A., Grant, V., & Cheng, A. (2020). Managing psychological safety in debriefings: A dynamic balancing act. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470
Kymäläinen, H., Laitila, J., Väätäinen, K., & Malinen, J. (2021). Workability and well-being at work among cut-to-length forest machine operators. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 42(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.5552/crojfe.2021.874
Lapointe, J. F., & Robert, J. M. (2000). Using VR for efficient training of forestry machine operators. Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012045305968
Lateef, F. (2010). Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock, 3(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.70743
Lee, J., Lee, H., Kim, S., Choi, M., Ko, I. S., Bae, J., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 87, 104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104345
Lee, E., Mun, H., Lim, H., & Park, S. (2025). The efficacy of simulator technology for forwarder operator training: A preliminary study in South Korea. Forests, 16(6), 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060882
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42923742
Messina Dahlberg, G., & Gustavsson, S. (2024). From doing to learning: Students’ self-evaluation and reflective practices in VET. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 14(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2414255
Messina Dahlberg, G., & Gustavsson, S. (2025). Keeping worlds apart to put them back together: VET teachers’ instructional patterns in simulation-based training. Instructional Science, 53(4), 787–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09714-x
Nyström, S., & Ahn, S. E. (2025). Vocational students’ experiences and reflections on simulation training: What differences enable or hinder learning? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 77(5), 1353–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2025.2449659
Näykki, P., Laitinen-Väänänen, S., & Burns, E. (2022). Student teachers’ video-assisted collaborative reflections of socio-emotional experiences during teaching practicum. Frontiers in Education, 7, 846567. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.846567
Ovaskainen, H. (2005). Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments. Silva Fennica, 39(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.398
Ovaskainen, H. & Heikkilä, M. (2007). Visuospatial cognitive abilities in cut-to-length single-grip timber harvester work. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(9), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.06.004
Ovaskainen, H. (2009). Timber harvester operators’ working technique in first thinning and the importance of cognitive abilities on work productivity [Doctoral dissertation, University of Joensuu]. https://doi.org/10.14214/df.79
Poore, J. A., Cullen, D. L., & Schaar, G. L. (2014). Simulation-based inter-professional education guided by Kolb’s experiential learning theory. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(5), e241–e247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004
Rudolph, J. W., Foldy, E. G., Robinson, T., Kendall, S., Taylor, S. S., & Simon, R. (2013). Helping without harming: The instructor’s feedback dilemma in debriefing — A case study. Simulation in Healthcare, 8(5), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318294854e
Rystedt, H., & Sjöblom, B. (2012). Realism, authenticity, and learning in healthcare simulations: Rules of relevance and irrelevance as interactive achievements. Instructional Science, 40(5), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9213-x
Salakari, H. (2005). Simulaattoriopetuksen pedagoginen malli [The pedagogical model for the simulator teaching]. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 7(1), 40–51.
Salakari, H. (2007). Taitojen opetus [Skills teaching]. Eduskills Consulting.
Salakari, H. (2010). Simulaattorikouluttajan käsikirja [Simulator instructor’s hand-book]. Eduskills Consulting.
Sellberg, C. (2018). From briefing, through scenario, to debriefing: The maritime instructor’s work during simulator-based training. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0446-y
Silvennoinen, M., Parviainen, T., Malinen, A., Karjalainen, S., Manu, M., & Vesisenaho, M. (2022). Combining physiological and experiential measures to study the adult learning experience. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations (pp. 137–164) (Professional and practice-based learning, 33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_7
Wickers, M. P. (2010). Establishing the climate for a successful debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(3), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.06.003
Zigmont, J. J., Kappus, L. J., & Sudikoff, S. N. (2011). Theoretical foundations of learning through simulation. Seminars in Perinatology, 35(2), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01.002
Østergaard, D., Dieckmann, P., & Lippert, A. (2011). Simulation and CRM. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 25(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2011.02.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mari Manu, Minna Silvennoinen, Piia Näykki, Mikko Vesisenaho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0.
