Becoming a construction worker in the connected classroom: Opposing school work with smartphones as happy objects
This article aims to fill a very specific and acute gap; in addition to the few studies on youth and digitalisation, smartphones and other mobile tools, it is very clear that the field of research concerning these issues in regards to vocational education and training is close to non-existent. By examining male Building and Construction programme students’ collective use of smartphones in interaction during classes, this study contributes to increased knowledge about some of the challenges and possibilities that arise with the digitalisation of vocational education and training. The study uses new and innovative methods regarding how students’ digital activities in the classroom could be captured and studied, and approaches video recorded data through the lens of Sara Ahmed’s ideas of happy objects (2010), and the concept of community of practice (Wenger, 1998). The analyses show how the identity constructing processes that take shape when the students orient towards the smartphone as a happy object intersect with the students’ future vocational identity as building and constructing workers, as well as explicating an anti-school culture.
Aarsand, P.A., & Aronsson, K. (2009). Response cries and other gaming moves: Building intersubjectivity in gaming. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1557–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.014
Åberg, M., & Hedlin, M. (2015). Happy objects – happy men? Affect and materiality in vocational training. Gender and Education, 27(5), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1069797
Åberg, M., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2018). Wolf cries: On power, emotions and critical literacy in first-language teaching in Sweden. Gender and Education, 30(7), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1376041
Åhlund, A. (2015). Swedish as multiparty work: Tailoring talk in a second language classroom. (Diss.) Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392781
Andersson, I-G., Gunnarsson, K., Rosèn, G., & Moström Åberg, M. (2014). Knowledge and experiences of risks among pupils in vocational education. Safety and Health at Work, 5(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.06.002
Asplund, S-B. (2010). Läsning som identitetsskapande handling: Gemenskapande och utbrytningsförsök i fordonspojkars litteratursamtal [Reading as identity construction: Practices and processes of building a sense of community in literary discussions among male Vehicle Engineering students].(Diss.) Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Asplund, S-B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Tanner, M. (2018). Under the teacher’s radar: Literacy practices in task-related smartphone use in the connected classroom. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(Open Issue), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.01.03
Beland, L-P., & Murphy, R. (2015). Ill communication: Technology, distraction & student performance. Centre for Economic Performance (EP) (No. 1350). Discussion Paper.
Berglund, I. (2009). Byggarbetsplatsen som skola – eller skolan som byggarbetsplats? En studie av byggnadsarbetares yrkesutbildning [The site of construction as a school – or school as a site of construction]. (Diss.) Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
Chua, J.H. & Jamil, H. (2012). Factors influencing the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among TVET instructors in Malaysian TVET institution. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1539–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.096
Colley, H., James, D., Tedder, M., & Diment, K. (2003). Learning as becoming in vocational education and training: Class, gender and the role of vocational habitus. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(4), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200240
Connell, R.W. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Connell, R.W., & Pearse, R. (2002). Gender (Polity short introductions). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Eckert, P. (1998). Gender, social engagement, and linguistic style. In I.L. Pedersen, & J. Scheuer (Eds.), Sprog, koen – og kommunikation. Rapport fra 3. Nordiske Konference om Sproeg og Koen. Koebenhavn. 11.–13. Oktober 1997. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzels Forlag.
Evaldsson, A-C., & Corsaro, W.A. (1998). Play and games in the peer cultures of preschool and preadolescent children: An interpretative approach. Childhood, 5(4), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568298005004003
Ferm, L., Persson Thunqvist, D., Svensson, L., & Gustavsson, M. (2018). Students’ strategies for learning identities as industrial workers in a Swedish upper secondary school VET programme. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2017.1394357
Goffman, E. (1967). On face work. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (pp. 5–33). New York: Doubleday Anchor. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091926
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Hedlin, M., & Åberg, M. (2013). ”Vara med i gänget?” Yrkessocialisation och genus i två gymnasieprogram [‘Being one of the gang?’ Vocational socialisation and gender in two upper secondary programmes]. Uppsala: IFAU.
Hill, M. (2001). Om vikten av att få sig ett skratt: Ett elevperspektiv [On the importance of having a laugh: A student perspective]. In Villkor och vägar för grundläggande yrkesutbildning: Några forskarperspektiv [Conditions and pathways for basic vocational education: Some research perspectives](pp. 15–31). Stockholm: Skolverket.
Hill, M. (2007). Coola killar pluggar inte [Cool guys don’t study]. In J. Olofsson (Ed.), Utbildningsvägen: Vart leder den? Om ungdomar, yrkesutbildning och försörjning [The educational pathway: Where does it lead? About young people, vocational education and support](pp. 158–172). Stockholm: SNS förlag.
Holth, L. (2014). Passionate men and rational women: Gender contradictions in engineering. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2014.908629
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2. ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Högberg, R. (2009). Motstånd och konformitet: Om manliga yrkeselevers liv och identitetsskapande i relation till kärnämnena [Resistance and conformity: On the life and identity making of male vocational students in relation to the core subjects]. (Diss). Linköping : Linköpings universitet.
Högberg, R. (2011). Cheating as subversive and strategic resistance: Vocational students’ resistance and conformity towards academic subjects in a Swedish upper secondary school, Ethnography and Education, 6(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2011.610584
Kontio, J. (2016). Auto mechanics in English: Language use and classroom identity work. (Diss.) Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Korp, H. (2006). Lika chanser i gymnasiet? En studie om betyg, nationella prov och social reproduktion [Same opportunities in upper secondary school? A study of grades, national tests and social reproduction]. (Diss.) Malmö: Lärarutbildningen, Malmö högskola.
Korp, H. (2011). What counts as being smart around here? The performance of smartness and masculinity in vocational upper secondary education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197910397909
Kuznekoff, J-H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.767917
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee, Y-A. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction. Text and Talk, 30(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.020
Lennartsson, R. (2007). “Snus under läppen och en massa snuskprat”: Maskulinitetsskapande på byggprogrammet [Snuff under the lip and a lot of dirty talk: The construction of masculinity in the Building and Construction programme]. In G. Arvastson, & B. Ehn, Kulturnavigering i skolan [Culture navigation in school] (pp. 40–51). Malmö: Gleerups utbildning.
Mac An Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Mcconnell-Ginet, S. (1989). The sexual (re)production of meaning: A discoursebased theory. In F. Frank, & P.A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage (pp. 35–50). New York: MLA Publications.
Moret, J., Dümmler, K., & Dahinden, J. (2017). The car, the hammer and the cables under the tables: Intersecting masculinities and social class in a Swiss vocational school. European Journal of Sociology, 58(2), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975617000145
Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.) (2014). Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186
Nyström, A. (2012). Att synas och lära utan att synas lära: En studie om underprestation och privilegierade unga mäns identitetsförhandlingar i gymnasieskolan [To be seen and to learn, without being seen to learn: A study of under-achievement and identity-negotiation among privileged young men in upper-secondary school]. (Diss.) Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Olin-Scheller, C., Tanner, M., Asplund, S-B., Kontio, J., & Wikström, P. (under review).
Ott, T. (2017). Mobile phones in school: From disturbing objects to infrastructure for learning. (Diss.) Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
Pascoe, C.J. (2007). Dude, you're a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pascoe, C.J. (2012). Studying young people’s new media use: Methodological shifts and educational innovations. Theory into Practice, 51(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.662862
Reegård, K. (2015). Sales assistants in the making: Learning through responsibility. Vocations and Learning, 8(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9129-0
Robles, J.S., DiDomenico, S.M., & Raclaw, J. (2018). Doing being an ordinary communication technology and social media user. Language & Communication, 60, 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.002
Rosvall, P-Å. (2011). Pedagogic practice and influence in a Vehicle Program class. In E. Öhrn, L. Lundahl, & D. Beach (Eds.), Young people’s influence and democratic education: Ethnographic studies in upper secondary schools (pp. 92–111). London: Tufnell Press.
Rosvall, P-Å. (2015). ‘Lad’ research, the reproduction of stereotypes: Ethnographic dilemmas when researching boys from working-class background. Ethnography and Education, 10(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2015.1016054
Sahlström, F., Tanner, M., & Valasmo, V. (2019). Connected youth, connected classrooms: Smartphone use and student and teacher participation during plenary teaching. Learning, culture and social interaction, 21, 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.008
Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Shava, H., Chinyamurindi, W., & Somdyala, A. (2016). An investigation into the usage of mobile phones among technical and vocational educational and training students in South Africa. SA Journal of Information Management, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v18i1.716
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.) (2014). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Skolverket (2011). Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola 2011 (Gy11) [Curriculum for the upper secondary school]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Sparrman, A., & Aronsson, K. (2003). Pog game practices, learning and ideology: Local markets and identity work. In G. Walford (Ed.), Investigating educational policy through ethnography (Studies in Educational Ethnography, Vol. 8) (pp. 153–168). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-210X(03)08008-2
Stevanovic, T.M., & Weiste, E.H. (2017). Conversation-analytic data session as a pedagogical institution. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.001
Tanner, M., Olin-Scheller, C., Buskqvist, U., & Åkerlund, D. (2017). Ett papperslöst klassrum? Utmaningar för det uppkopplade klassrummets literacypraktiker. [A paperless classroom? Challenges for literacy practices in the connected classroom]. In C. Olin-Scheller, M. Tanner, M. Tengberg, & B. Ljung-Egeland (Eds.), Textkulturer [Text cultures] (pp. 175–194). Karlstad, Sweden: Karlstads universitet.
Taylor, A. (2009). Mapping the field of VET partnership. Vocations and Learning, 2(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-009-9021-x
Wei, F-Y.F., Wang, Y.K., & Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students’ self-regulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.672755
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Copyright (c) 2020 Stig-Börje Asplund, Janne Kontio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
NJVET is an open access journal, this means anyone can access, freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the Nordic network for vocational education and training (NordYrk) in publishing the journal. From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC-BY 4.0.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the authors. However, we publish with the agreement of the authors that if they decide later to publish the articles elsewhere, the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by NJVET.
When publishing with NJVET, it is with the agreement of the authors that if they make their articles available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own websites or institutional websites), that they will do so by making links to the articles as published in NJVET using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) numbers of the articles and acknowledge in the text of the sites that the articles have been previously published in NJVET.