Simulation-based training in VET through the lens of a sociomaterial perspective
This article aims to review the pedagogical research on simulation training in voca-tional education and training (VET) and to discuss the emerging teaching practice from a socio-material perspective on learning and practice. Literature reviews on research into simulation training with pedagogical interests show that there are three main themes: 1) the effect of technology-enhanced simulation training, 2) the fidelity and authenticity of simulation and learning, and 3) pedagogical consideration and under-pinnings. The article draws on a sociomaterial perspective on learning and practice to problematise and discuss the findings of previous research. This theoretical perspec-tive makes it possible to discuss how technology, educational practice and social rela-tions are intertwined and precondition each other.
Through the lens of sociomaterial theory, the article discusses how the introduction of the new technologies brings about changes and expectations of what can be learned, how the teaching practices are enacted and how this affects the relationship between teachers and students.
Aarkrog, V. (2019). ‘The mannequin is more lifelike’: The significance of fidelity for students´ learning in simulation-based training in the social and healthcare programmes. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 9(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.19921
Ahn, S., & Rimpiläinen, S. (2018). Maintaining Sofia – or how to reach the intended learning outcomes during a medical simulation training. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2018.092095
Ahn, S., Rimpiläinen, S., Theodorsson, A., Fenwick, T., & Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (2015). Learning in technology-enhanced medical simulation: Locations and knowings. Professions & Professionalism, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.973
Beaubien J., & Baker P. (2004). The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: How low can you go? Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl 1), i51–i56. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009845
Berglund, I. (2004). Lärande simulering eller simulerat lärande? En studie av fyra elevers lärande av styrteknik med användning av ett datorbaserat inlärningsprogram på gymnasieskolans elprogram [Learning by simulation or simulated learning?]. Licentiate thesis. Stockholm: Lärarhögskolan.
Berragan, L. (2011). Simulation: An effective pedagogical approach for nursing? Nurse Education Today. 31(7), 660–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.019
Breckwoldt, J., Gruber, H., & Wittmann, A. (2014). Simulation learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of researching professional and practice-based learning (pp. 673–698). London: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_25
Cook, D.A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J.H., Wang, A.T., Erwin, P.J., & Hamstra, S.J. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of American Medical Association, 306(9), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1234
De Giovanni, D., Roberts, T., & Norman, G. (2009). Relative effectiveness of high-versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds. Medical education, 43(7), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03398.x
Dieckmann, P., Molin Friis, S., Lippert, A., & Østergaard, D. (2009). The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice. Medical Teacher, 31(7), e287–e294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590902866218
Fenwick, T. (2012). Co-production in practice: A sociomaterial analysis. Professions & Professionalism, 2(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp/v2i1.323
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849088
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z.A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., & Zurayk, H. (2010). Health professional for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet, 376(9756), 1923–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5
Hager, P., Lee, A., & Reich, A. (Eds.) (2012). Practice, learning and change: Practice theory perspectives on professional learning. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6
Hansson, Y. (2004). Simuleringar: För lärande och insikt [Simulation: For learning and insight] (1st ed.). Stockholm: Gothia.
Husebø, D., Dieckmann, P., Rystedt, H., & Friberg, F. (2013). The relationship between facilitators’ questions and the level of reflection in the post-simulation debriefing. Simulation in healthcare, 8(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5c
Issenberg, S.B., McGaghie, W.C., Petrusa, E.R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R.J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical teacher, 27(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., van de Wiel, M.W.J., & Boshuizen, H.P.A. (2015). Teacher’s perceptions of teaching in workplace simulation in vocational education. Vocations and learning, 8(3), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9137-0
Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907327_003
Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis, & T.J. Smith. (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–62). Rotterdam: Sense Publications. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903275_004
Khaled, A., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2015). How authenticity and self-directedness and student perceptions thereof predict competence development in hands-on simulations. British Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3138
Leibring, I. (2015). Metodrumsundervisning: En kvalitativ studie av simulering inom vård- och omsorgsutbildning [Clinical skills laboratory teaching: A qualitative study of simulation in nursing and healthcare education]. Licentiate thesis. Karlstad: Karlstads universitet.
Lindberg, V. (2003). Yrkesutbildning i omvandling: En studie av lärandepraktiker och kunskapstransformationer [Vocational education in change: A study of learning practices and knowledge transformations]. PhD thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Lucas, B., Spencer, E., & Claxton, G. (2012). How to teach vocational education: A theory of vocational pedagogy. City & Guilds Center for skills development. Retrieved 2. March, 2016, from: https://www.educationinnovations.org/sites/default/files/How-to-teach-vocational-education.pdf
Magnusson, P. (2009). Simulerade rattar: En studie om simulatorn som pedagogiskt verktyg i buss- och lastbilsförarutbildningar [Simulated stearing wheels: A study of simulation as a tool for learning how to drive bus and trucks]. Master thesis. Retrieved 2. March, 2016, from: ttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-6214
Motola, I., Devine, L.A., Chung, H.S., Sullivan, J.E., & Issenberg, S.B. (2013). Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher, 35(10), e1511–e1530. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003) Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 3–31). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Norman, G., Dore, K., & Grierson, L. (2012). The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Medical education, 46(7), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04243.x
Nyström, S., Dahlberg, J., Edelbring, S., Hult, H., & Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (2016a). Debriefing practices in interprofessional simulation with students: A sociomaterial perspective. BMC Medical education, 16(148), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0666-5
Nyström, S., Dahlberg, J., Hult, H., & Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (2016b). Enacting simulation: A sociomaterial perspective on students’ interprofessional collaboration. Journal of interprofessional care, 30(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2016.1152234
Paisley, A.M., Baldwin, P.J., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2001). Validity of surgical simulation for the assessment of operative skills. British Journal of Surgery, 88(11), 1525–1532. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01880.x
Paré, G., Trudel, M-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
Rettedal, A. (2009). Illusion and technology in medical simulation: If you cannot build it, make them believe. In P. Dieckmann (Ed.), Using simulations for education, training and research (pp. 202–214). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
Rooney, D., Hopwood, N., Boud, D., & Kelly, M. (2015). The role of simulation in pedagogies of higher education for the health professions: Through a practice-based lens. Vocations and Learning, 8(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9138-z
Rooney, D., & Nyström, S. (2018). Simulation: A complex pedagogical space. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(6), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4470
Rudolph, J., Simon, R., Dufresne, R., & Raemer, D. (2006). There’s no such thing as “non-judgemental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgements. Simulation in healthcare, 1(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01266021-200600110-00006
Rystedt, H. (2009). Simulering: Att återskapa vårdpraktiker som lärande miljöer [Simulation: To recreate health care practices as a learning environment]. In J. Linderoth (Ed.) Individ, teknik och lärande [Individual, technology and learning] (pp. 44–66) Stockholm: Carlssons.
Rystedt, H., & Sjöblom, B. (2012). Realism, authenticity, and learning in healthcare simulations: Rules of relevance and irrelevance as interactive achievements. Instructional Science, 40(5), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9213-x
Schatzki, T.R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E.V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T.R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2010). Materiality and social life. Nature and Culture, 5(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050202
Tosterud, R. (2015). Simulation used as a learning approach in nursing education: Students’ experiences and validation of evaluation questionnaires. PhD thesis. Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2020 Sofia Nyström, Song-ee Ahn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
NJVET is an open access journal, this means anyone can access, freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the Nordic network for vocational education and training (NordYrk) in publishing the journal. From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC-BY 4.0.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the authors. However, we publish with the agreement of the authors that if they decide later to publish the articles elsewhere, the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by NJVET.
When publishing with NJVET, it is with the agreement of the authors that if they make their articles available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own websites or institutional websites), that they will do so by making links to the articles as published in NJVET using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) numbers of the articles and acknowledge in the text of the sites that the articles have been previously published in NJVET.