Dropout prevention in vocational education: Evidence from Finnish register data

Ville Vehkasalo

doi:10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2010281

Authors

Ville Vehkasalo National Audit Office of Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2010281

Keywords:

vocational schools, study completion, programme evaluation, register data, econometric methods

Abstract

A large-scale dropout prevention programme was implemented in Finnish vocational education in 2011–2014. We used detailed register data to evaluate the programme’s effects and to circumvent the attrition bias of pretest-posttest surveys. Our data included approximately 24,000 randomly sampled students, both from the participating schools and the non-participating schools, before and after the programme. We estimated the effect of the programme on study completion and dropping out using pooled cross sections and difference-in-differences regression methods. Both study measures have improved during the last decade, but our results suggest that the programme was not effective in increasing study completion or in reducing the number of dropouts. The likely causes for the improved levels of vocational degree completion include recent macroeconomic fluctuations and legislative changes in teenagers’ eligibility for unemployment benefits.

References

Ahola, S., Saikkonen, L., & Valkoja-Lähteenmäki, L. (2015). Ammatillisen koulutuksen läpäisyn tehostamisohjelma - Arviointiraportti [Programme for improving graduation rates in vocational education - Evaluation report]. Helsinki: National Board of Education. (In Finnish with an English abstract.)

Andersen, S., Rod, M., Holmberg, T., Ingholt, L., Ersböll, A., & Tolstrup, J. (2018). Effectiveness of the settings-based intervention Shaping the Social on preventing dropout from vocational education: A Danish non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology, 6:45, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0258-8

Cerda-Navarro, A., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2017). Recommendations for confronting vocational education dropout: A literature review. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9:17, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-017-0061-4

Campbell, C. (2015). The socioeconomic consequences of dropping out of high school: Evidence from an analysis of siblings. Social Science Research, 51, 108-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.011

Ecker-Lyster, M., & Niileksela, C. (2016). Keeping students on track to graduate: A synthesis of school dropout trends, prevention, and intervention initiatives. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 19(2), 24-31.

Finnish National Agency for Education. (2019). Education system in Finland. Retrieved 10. June, 2019, from https://www.oph.fi/english/education_system

Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., McCoach, D.B., Sugai, G., Lombardi, A., & Horner, R. (2015). An analysis of the relationship between implementation of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports and high school dropout rates. The High School Journal, 98(4), 290-315.
https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2015.0009

Goulet, M., Archambault, I., Janosz, M., & Christenson, S.L. (2018). Evaluating the implementation of Check & Connect in various school settings: Is intervention fidelity necessarily associated with positive outcomes? Evaluation and Program Planning, 68, 34-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.004

Gubbels, J., van der Put, C.E., & Assink, M. (2019). Risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 1637-1667.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01072-5

Hahn, R.A., Knopf, J.A., Wilson, S.J., Truman, B.I., Milstein, B., Johnson, R.L., Fielding, J.E., Muntaner, C.J.M., Jones, C.P., Fullilove, M.T., Moss, R.D., Ueffing, E., & Hunt, P.C. (2015). Programs to increase high school completion: A community guide systematic health equity review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(5), 599-608.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.005

Kristman, V., Manno, M., & Côté, P. (2004). Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: How much is too much? European Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 751-760.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000036568.02655.f8

Kristman, V., Manno, M., & Côté, P. (2005). Methods to account for attrition in longitudinal data: Do they work? A simulation study. European Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 657-662.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-7919-7

Ripamonti, E. (2018). Risk factors for dropping out of high school: A review of contemporary, international empirical research. Adolescent Research Review, 3, 321-338.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0075-y

Statistics Finland. (2019). Educational structure of population. Retrieved 10. June, 2019, from http://pxnet2.stat.fi

Weisman, S.A., & Gottfredson, D.C. (2001). Attrition from after school programs: Characteristics of students who drop out. Prevention Science, 2, 201-205.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011515024809

Wilson, S.J., Tanner-Smith, E.E., Lipsey, M.W., Steinka-Fry, K., & Morrison, J. (2011). Dropout prevention and intervention programs: Effects on school completion and dropout among school-aged children and youth. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7(1):8, 1-61.
https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2011.8

Wooldridge, J.M. (2010). Econometrics of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.