Enhancing learning as theoretical thinking in robotic surgery
Professionals in many domains need to deal with increasingly complex, technology-mediated and uncertain work. Thus ways of learning that continuously and flexibly create new knowledge are needed at work. The aim of this article is to describe the logic of theoretical-genetic generalisation, and to use this, in addition to other methodological resources from pragmatism and cultural-historical psychology, for devel-oping a learning method for robotic surgery. In theoretical generalisation, or theoretical thinking, the learner orientates him-/herself in two directions: towards producing general, abstract understanding of dynamic interrelations within a phenomenon, and towards flexibly tailoring good solutions for each particular situation. Based on our ongoing study of robotic surgery, we sketch three different designs for learning which are all based on video-supported joint reflection of real robotic surgical operations. We outline the necessary principles and steps of the method in this context, and finally, discuss the potential of the outlined method for learning.
Alvunger, D., & Adolfsson, C.-H. (2016). Introducing a critical dialogical model for vocational teacher education. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 6(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.166153
Boud, D., Cressey, P., & Docherty, P. (2006). Productive reflection: Learning for changing organizations. London: Routledge.
Clot, Y. (2009). Clinic of activity: The dialogue as an instrument. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 286–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989.019
Clot, Y. (2011). Travail et pouvoir d’agir [Work and power to act]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Davydov, V.V. (1990) Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davydov, V.V. (2008) Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study. International Perspectives in Non-classical Psychology. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1994). Training for change: New approaches to instruction and learning in working life. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Engeström, Y., Nummijoki, J., & Sannino, A. (2012). Embodied germ cell at work: Building an expansive concept of physical mobility in home care. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.688177
Ilyenkov, E.V. (1982). Dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s capital. Moscow: Progress. Also available at (retrieved 20. February, 2017): https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/abstract/>
Ilyenkov, E.V. (2007). Our schools should teach how to think. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(4), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405450402
Kloetzer, L. (2012). Development of professional concepts through work analysis: Tech diving under the loop of activity clinic. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(4), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.688087
Kloetzer, L., Clot, Y., & Quillerou-Grivot, E. (2015). Stimulating dialogue at work: The activity clinic approach to learning and development. In L. Fillietaz, & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_3
Langemeyer, I. (2014). Learning in a simulation-OT in heart surgery and the challenges of the scientification of work. Journal of Education and Work, 27(3), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.742182
Nelissen, J.M.C., & Tomic, W. (1996). Reflection in Russian educational psychology. Educational Foundations, Winter 1996, 35–56.
Norros, L. (2017). Understanding acting in complex environments: Building a synergy of cultural-historical theory of activity, Peirce, and ecofunctionalism. Mind, Culture, and Activity. Published online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1350714
Norros, L., Savioja, P., & Koskinen, H. (2015). Core-task design: A practice-theory approach to human factors. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics #27. Penn State University: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Pihlaja, J. (2005). Learning in and for production: An activity-theoretical study of the historical development of distributed systems of generalizing. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 571–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311417485
Sannino, A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6(2015), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001
Seppänen, L., & Riikonen, J. (2016). Learning interpretativeness for sustainability: Exploring the self-confrontation method in robotic surgery. In A. Harju, & A. Heikkinen (Eds.), Adult education and the planetary condition (pp. 124–133). Helsinki: Finnish Adult Education Association. Published online: http://issuu.com/svv-ohjelma/docs/adult_educ_planetary_cond_2016?e=15627691/36835887
Seppänen, L., Kloetzer, L., Riikonen, J., & Wahlström, M. (2016). A developmental perspective to studying objects in robotic surgery. In L. Introna, D. Kavanach, S. Kelly, W. Orlikowski, & S. Scott (Eds.), Beyond interpretivism? New encounters with technology and organization. Springer International Publishing: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology Vol. 489, pp. 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_14
Seppänen, L., Kloetzer, L., & Riikonen, J. (2017). Encourager la réflexion en chirurgie robotique: L’auto-confrontation croisée comme instrument de développement du travail interprétatif dans un environnement technologique complexe [Encouraging reflection in robotic surgery: Crossed self-confrontations as an instrument for developing interpretive practice in a complex technological environment]. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 23(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2017.01.008
Su, L.-M., & Smith, J.A. (2012). Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadetectomy. In L.R. Kavoussi, A.C. Novick, A.W. Partin, & C.A. Peters (Eds.), Campbell-Walsh urology, 10th edition (Chapter 103, pp. 2833–2843). Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-6911-9.00103-1
Taari, K., Aaltomaa, S., Nurmi, M., Parpala, T., & Tammela, T. (Eds.). (2013). Urologia. Helsinki: Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.
Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2011). Supporting expansive learning through theoretical-genetic reflection in the Change Laboratory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111119780
Virkkunen, J., & Schaupp, M. (2011). From change to development: Expanding the concept of intervention. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311417486
Wahlström, M., Norros, L., Seppänen, L., Schaupp, M., & Toiviainen, H. (2014). Interpretative work: Developing new forms of work-based learning for the age of digitalisation (WOBLE). Retrieved 15. February, 2017, from https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11126152/Woble_research_plan.pdf
Wahlström, M., Seppänen, L., Norros, L., Aaltonen, I., & Riikonen, J. (submitted). Resilience in through interpretive practice: A study of robotic surgery.
Copyright (c) 2018 Laura Seppänen, Marika Schaupp, Mikael Wahlström
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
NJVET is an open access journal, this means anyone can access, freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the Nordic network for vocational education and training (NordYrk) in publishing the journal. From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC-BY 4.0.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the authors. However, we publish with the agreement of the authors that if they decide later to publish the articles elsewhere, the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by NJVET.
When publishing with NJVET, it is with the agreement of the authors that if they make their articles available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own websites or institutional websites), that they will do so by making links to the articles as published in NJVET using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) numbers of the articles and acknowledge in the text of the sites that the articles have been previously published in NJVET.