How schools contribute to keeping students on track: Narratives from vulnerable students in vocational education and training
Keywords:vocational education and training, vocational schools, dropout, vulnerable students, school organisation
This article examines characteristics, practices and conditions within schools that enable vulnerable students to succeed in school. Research suggests that factors related to structure, educational organisation or the climate within schools may play a part in either pushing out or holding on to students whose personal characteristics may put them at risk of dropping out. The study is based on 25 qualitative interviews with students in the second year of vocational education and training. All the students had a low grade point average from lower secondary school, and the majority had an immigrant background from Africa or Asia. The analysis shows that practice-oriented learning from authentic work tasks provided meaningful connections between schoolwork and students’ career choices and opportunities to experience success and mastery. Furthermore, positive expectations and the active support of teachers as well as mutual motivation and support among classmates contributed to students’ sense of belonging at school. The study discusses the importance of schools supporting less school-oriented young people in connecting and identifying with school, both with the social environment and with the educational content and learning methods.
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers Col-lege Record, 103(5), 760–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00134
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Blondal, K. S., & Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2012). Student disengagement in rela-tion to expected and unexpected educational pathways. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.568607
Bradley, C. L., & Renzulli, L. A. (2011). The complexity of non-completion: Be-ing pushed or pulled to drop out of high school. Social Forces, 90(2), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sor003
Cedefop. (2016). Leaving education early: Putting vocational education and training centre stage. Volume I: Investigating causes and extent. Publications Office of the European Union.
Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, C. M. (2007). School characteristics re-lated to high school dropout rates. Remedial and Special Education, 28(6), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280060201
Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teach-ers College Record, 103(4), 548–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00127
Crumpton, H. E., & Gregory, A. (2011). “I’m not learning”: The role of academ-ic relevancy for low-achieving students. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903567398
Doll, J. J., Eslami, Z., & Walters, L. (2013). Understanding why students drop out of high school, according to their own reports: Are they pushed or pulled, or do they fall out? A comparative analysis of seven nationally rep-resentative studies. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503834
Domina, T., Penner, A., & Penner, E. (2017). Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053354
Dunn, C., Chambers, D., & Rabren, K. (2004). Variables affecting students’ de-cisions to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250050501
Dæhlen, M. (2017). Completion in vocational and academic upper secondary school: The importance of school motivation, self-efficacy, and individual characteristics. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12223
Elffers, L., Oort, F. J., & Karsten, S. (2012). Making the connection: The role of social and academic school experiences in students’ emotional engagement with school in post-secondary vocational education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.08.005
Elffers, L. (2013). Staying on track: Behavioral engagement of at-risk and non-at-risk students in post-secondary vocational education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0128-3
Falch, T., Johannesen, A. B., & Strøm, B. (2009). Kostnader av frafall i videregående opplæring [Costs of dropout from upper secondary education]. Senter for Økonomisk Forskning.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gambetta, D. (1987). Were they pushed or did they jump? Individual decision mecha-nisms in education. Cambride University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735868
Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE.
Gilliam, L. (2018). Minoritetsdanske drenge i skolen: Modvilje og forskelsbehandling [Minority Danish boys in school: Aversion and discrimination]. Aarhus universitetsforlag.
Hardoy, I., Mastekaasa, A., & Schøne, P. (2018). Immigrant concentration and student outcomes in upper secondary schools: Norwegian evidence. Europe-an Societies, 20(2), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2017.1402120
Haugan, J. A., Frostad, P., & Mjaavatn, P.-E. (2019). A longitudinal study of fac-tors predicting students’ intentions to leave upper secondary school in Norway. Social Psychology of Education, 22(5), 1259–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09527-0
Hermansen, A. S., & Birkelund, G. E. (2015). The impact of immigrant class-mates on educational outcomes. Social Forces, 94(2), 615–646. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov073
Krane, V., Karlsson, B., Ness, O., & Binder, P.-E. (2016). They need to be recog-nized as a person in everyday life: Teachers’ and helpers’ experiences of teacher–student relationships in upper secondary school. International Jour-nal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 11(1), 31634. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.31634
Krane, V., Ness, O., Holter-Sorensen, N., Karlsson, B., & Binder, P.-E. (2017). ‘You notice that there is something positive about going to school’: How teachers’ kindness can promote positive teacher–student relationships in upper secondary school. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1202843
Lamb, S. (2011). School dropout and inequality. In S. Lamb, E. Markussen, R. Teese, N. Sandberg, & J. Polesel (Eds.), School dropout and completion: Interna-tional comparative studies in theory and policy (pp. 369–390). Springer.
Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002353
Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019003205
Markussen, E., Frøseth, M. W., Sandberg, N., Lødding, B., & Borgen, J. S. (2011). Early leaving, non-completion and completion in upper secondary educa-tion in Norway. In S. Lamb, E. Markussen, R. Teese, N. Sandberg, & J. Polesel (Eds.), School dropout and completion: International comparative studies in theory and policy (pp. 253–271). Springer.
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student en-gagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). Teachers College Press.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2020). Grunnskolepoeng [Grade point average]. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/statistikk/statistikk-grunnskole/grunnskolepoeng/
Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2018). Kvalifisert, forberedt og motivert: Et kunnskaps-grunnlag om struktur og innhold i videregående opplæring [Qualified, prepared, and motivated. A knowledge base on structure and content in upper sec-ondary education] (Norwegian White Paper 2018:15).
Repstad, K. (2020). Yrkesretting av fellesfag (2. ed.) [Vocationalisation of com-mon core subjects]. Pedlex.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. Urban Re-view, 3(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322211
Rumberger, R. W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evi-dence. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057002101
Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analy-sis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 583–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003583
Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674063167
Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Educa-tion, 73(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673198
Schmid, E. (2021). ”Alle sammen støtter hverandre og hjelper hverandre hvis vi trenger motivasjon”: Et elevperspektiv på læring og relasjoner i flerkul-turelle videregående skoler med lave inntakskrav [’Everyone supports and helps each other when we need motivation’: A student perspective on learn-ing and relations in multi-ethnic upper secondary schools with low admis-sion requirements]. Nordisk tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning, 2(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-8162-2021-01-03
Schmid, E., & Garrels, V. (2021). Parental involvement and educational success among vulnerable students in vocational education and training. Educational Research. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00131881.2021.1988672
Statistics Norway. (2020a). Karakterer ved avsluttet grunnskole [Grades at the end of elementary school]. https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/11688/
Statistics Norway. (2020b). Gjennomføring i videregående opplæring [Completion of upper secondary education]. https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/11592/
Statistics Norway. (2021). Marks, lower secondary school. https://www.ssb.no/en/utdanning/statistikker/kargrs/aar
Stearns, E., & Glennie, E. J. (2006). When and why dropouts leave high school. Youth & Society, 38(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X05282764
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. The University of Chigaco Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Reten-tion: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917
Traag, T., & van der Velden, R. K. W. (2011). Early school-leaving in the Neth-erlands: The role of family resources, school composition and background characteristics in early school-leaving in lower secondary education. Irish Educational Studies, 30(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2011.535975
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
Wang, S., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Meissel, K. (2018). A systematic review of the teacher expectation literature over the past 30 years. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3–5), 124–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1548798
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Evi Schmid, Beate Jørstad, Gøril Stokke Nordlie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0.