One size fits nobody: En casestudie av yrkesfaglæreres deltakelse i kompetanse-utviklingsarbeid i videregående skole

[One size fits nobody: A case study of vocational education and training teachers’ participation in professional development pro-jects in upper secondary school]


  • Julie Klovholt Leonardsen NTNU - Norwegian university of technology and science



vocational education and training teacher, dual professionalism, professional development, assessment, assessment literacy


Vocational education and training (VET) teachers have a dual profession as teachers and vocational workers. Professional development projects in school must apply to both sides of their profession. However, VET teachers’ need for professional development, particularly in terms of student assessment, has not been significantly explored. This ethnographic case study examines what aspects of professional development projects VET teachers perceive as meaningful for developing their assessment literacy. Data was collected through observations of 31 VET teachers in two upper secondary schools, in the context of a professional development project aiming to strengthen assessment literacy. Eighteen of these teachers also participated in focus group interviews. Findings show that if VET teachers are to find professional development projects in school meaningful for developing their assessment literacy, the projects must 1) have vocational relevance, 2) maintain a vocational perspective on the validity of assessment of students’ vocational competence, and 3) take place in a learning and development-oriented culture. Unfortunately, professional development projects do not address teachers’ developmental needs due to tensions among professional, socio-cultural and organisational contexts in school and vocational workplaces. 


Andersson, P. & Köpsén, S. (2015). Continuing professional development of vocational teachers: Participation in a Swedish national initiative. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(1).

Aspøy, T. M., Skinnarland, S. & Tønder, A. H. (2017). Yrkesfaglærerens kompetan-se. FAFO-rapport 2017:11.

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Uni-versity of Cambridge.

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

Black, P. & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–33.

Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318.

Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2. utgave). SAGE.

DeLuca, C., Chavez, T. & Cao, C. (2013). Establishing a foundation for valid teacher judgement on student learning: The role of pre-service assessment education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 107–126.

DeLuca, C. & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identify-ing gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419–438.

DeLuca, C. (2012). Preparing teachers for the age of accountability: Toward a framework for assessment education. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5–6), 576–591.

DeLuca, C, Coombs, A., MacGregor, S. & Rasooli, A. (2019). Toward a differen-tial and situated view of assessment literacy: Studying teachers’ responses to classroom assessment scenarios. Frontiers in Education, 4.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of edu-cation. Macmillian.

Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Free Press.

Eggen, A. B. (2011). Vurdering for skoleutvikling. Gyldendal akademisk.

Engh, R. (2011). Vurdering for læring i skolen: På vei mot en bærekraftig vurderings-kultur. Høyskoleforlaget.

Fejes, A. & Köpsén, S. (2014). Vocational teachers’ identity formation through boundary crossing. Journal of Education and Work, 27(3), 265–283.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Quali-tative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

Gills, S. & Bateman, A. (1999). Assessing in VET: Issues of reliability and validity. Review of research. NCVER.

Gjerustad, G. & Waagene, E. (2015). Spørsmål til Skole-Norge 2015: Resultater og analyser fra Utdanningsdirektoratets spørreundersøkelse blant skoler og skoleeiere NIFU-rapport 2015:19). NIFU.

Grande, S., Lyckander, R., Landro, J. & Rokkones, K. (2014). Frem i lyset! En kartlegging av status og behov for lærerutdanning for yrkesfag. HIOA.!/60886d96-25e0-4ef3-b67d-a153770ef7c4

Hiim, H. (2020). Å vurdere yrkeskompetanse: Hva er yrkeskompetanse, og hvordan kan den vurderes? Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 10(3), 45–66.

Høst, H. (2015). Kvalitet i fag- og yrkesopplæringen (NIFU-rapport 2015:14). NIFU.

Kane, M. T. (2015). Explicating validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Poli-cy & Practice, 23(2), 198–211.

Kemmis, R. B. & Green, A. (2013). Vocational education and training teachers’ conceptions of their pedagogy. International Journal of Training Research, 11(2), 101–121.

Klenowski, V. & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. SAGE.

Köpsén, S. (2014). How vocational teachers describe their vocational teacher identity. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 66(2), 194–211.

Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S., Anderssen, T. M. & Rygge, J. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Gyldendal akademisk.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Harvard University press.

Lewkowicz, D. J. (2001). The concept of ecological validity: What are its limita-tions and is it bad to be invalid? Infancy, 2(4), 437–450.

Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F. & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualis-ing the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assess-ment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442–467.

Messick, S. (1992). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the valida-tion of performance assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 1992(1), i–42.

Moss, P. (2013). Validity in action: Lessons from studies of data use. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 91–98.

Moss, P. A., Girard, B. J. & Haniford, L. C. (2006). Chapter 4: Validity in educa-tional assessment. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 109–162.

NTNU & TRFK. (2017). Skolebasert kompetanseutvikling i vurdering (SKUV)—Kunnskapsgrunnlaget.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday & Co.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamen-tal? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.

Ragin, C. C. & Becker, H. S. (Red.). (1992). What is a case? Exploring the founda-tions of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press.

Räisänen, A. & Räkköläinen, M. (2014). Assessment of learning outcomes in Finnish vocational education and training. Assessment in Education: Princi-ples, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 109–124.

Robson, J., Bailey, B. & Larkin, S. (2004). Adding value: Investigating the dis-course of professionalism adopted by vocational teachers in further educa-tion colleges. Journal of Education and Work, 17(2), 183–195.

Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What Is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2(4), 419–436.

Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Yale University Press.

Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–245.

Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Relevant classroom assessment training for teachers. Edu-cational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 7–12.

Street, B. V. (2002). Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives (1. ut-gave). Routledge.

Sund, G., Nore, H. & Vagle, I. (2009). Vurdering for og av læring i yrkesfag. I S. Dobson, K. Smith & A. B. Eggen (Red.), Vurdering, prinsipper og praksis (s. 214–234). Gyldendal.

Sylte, A. L. (2014). Vurdering for yrkesrelevant opplæring. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 4(1), 1–18.

Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–36.

Throndsen, I., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lie, S. & Dale, E. L. (22009). Bedre vurdering for læring: Rapport fra evaluering av modeller for kjennetegn på måloppnåelse i fag. Universitet i Oslo.

Xu, Y. & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A re-conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162.

Aamodt, P. O., Carlsten, T. C., Caspersen, J., Grøgaard, J. B. & Røsdal, T. (2016). Kompetanseutvikling blant yrkesfaglærere: En undersøkelse basert på OECD Tea-ching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) (NIFU-rapport 2016:6).

Aarkrog, V. & Wahlgren, B. (2015). Assessment of prior learning in adult voca-tional education and training. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(1), 39–58.




How to Cite

Leonardsen, J. K. (2021). One size fits nobody: En casestudie av yrkesfaglæreres deltakelse i kompetanse-utviklingsarbeid i videregående skole : [One size fits nobody: A case study of vocational education and training teachers’ participation in professional development pro-jects in upper secondary school]. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 11(2), 1–24.



Peer-reviewed research articles