De fem A’er: En evalueringsmodel for læreprocesser på erhvervsuddannelserne

[The five A’s: An assessment model for vocational education]

  • Lene Tanggaard Aalborg Universitet, Danmark
Keywords: assessment, dynamic assessment, formative assessment, the five A-model, vocational education

Abstract

This article develops the contours of a new Five A-model for assessment practices in vocational education. The model develops a combination of the Five A-model taken from creativity research with empirical studies of vocational education. The rationale is to create a basis for description, analysis and development of assessment in vocational education. The Five A-model presents a heuristic method used to describe and reflect on basic assessment practices in vocational education studying the simultaneously related and dynamically interacting role of respectively actors, action, audiences, artefacts and affordances for assessment. On this basis, the article asks not only how research on assessment developed vital distinctions between summative and formative assessment, but also how the idea of formative assessment can be a vehicle to further development of artefacts supporting boundary crossing between schools and learning in the workplace, and furthermore, how apprentices can take responsibility for their own assessment actions. Assessment practices are never neutral, but they contribute in themselves to the valorisation of particular practices, which is why researchers and practitioners in the field must continuously ask critical questions related to the consequences of assessment.

References

Aastrup Rømer, T. (2003). Læring og evaluering i nyere uddannelsesteori. Ph.d.-afhandling indleveret ved Institut for Læring. Ålborg: Ålborg Universitet.

Beckman, S.L. & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166415

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: King's College London School of Education.

Boud, D. (2003). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. New York: Routledge/Falmer.

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252

Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Glăveanu, V.P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528

Haywood, H.C. & Lidz, C.S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607516

Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2007). Introduction: Assessment for the longer term. I D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Red.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (s. 3-13). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309

Foss Hansen, H. (2001). Evaluering: Teori og praksis i designprocessen. Nordiske Organisationsstudier, 3(3), 43-62.

Lidz, C.S. (Red.) (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

Moss, P.A., Pullin, D., Paul Gee, J. & Haertel, E.H. (2005). The idea of testing: Psychometric and sociocultural perspectives. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 3(2), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0302_1

Nielsen, K. (2003). Når eleverne selv skal sige det. I K. Nielsen & S. Kvale (Red.), Praktikkens læringslandskab (s. 219-236). København: Akademisk Forlag.

Schwendimann, B.A., Cattaneo, A.A.P., Dehler Zuffrey, J., Gurtner, J.-L., Bétrancourt, M. & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). The 'Erfahrraum': A pedagogical model for designing educational technologies in dual vocational systems. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 67(3), 367-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2015.1061041

Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004

Tanggaard, L. (2006a). Læring og identitet. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

Tanggaard, L. (2006b). Situating gendered learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(4), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620610665827

Tanggaard, L. & Elmholdt, E. (2008). Assessment in Practice: An inspiration from apprenticeship. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830701786719

Tanggaard, L. & Szulevicz, T. (2013). Sociale læreprocesser som analytisk strategi. Psyke & Logos, 34(1), 69-82.

Tanggaard, L. & Glăveanu, V.P. (2014). Creativity assessment as intervention: The case-study of creative learning. Akademisk kvarter / Academic Quarter, 9, 18-30.

Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. I D. Tzuriel, Dynamic assessment of young children (s. 63-75). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1255-4

Van der Veer, R. & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Published
2020-09-30
How to Cite
Tanggaard, L. (2020). De fem A’er: En evalueringsmodel for læreprocesser på erhvervsuddannelserne. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 10(3), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2010317