Collaborative problem solving: A pedagogy for workplace relevance




collaborative problem solving, situated learning, instruction, case studies


Collaborative problem solving (CPS) is a widely used pedagogical approach in work-based learning. To facilitate the complex process of situated learning, researchers have emphasized the need for scaffolding to enable learning of skills while engaged in problem-solving. While CPS as a pedagogical practice has mainly been examined in classroom situations, a research gap exists in studies of CPS in real-world contexts. In this study, we contribute to the understanding of CPS by examining the contextual characteristics that shape students’ and teachers’ experiences in situated learning. Consequently, we present a multi-case study to investigate involvement of a business professional as a source for scaffolding on site, in a hotel business environment. We employed a qualitative, multi-case methodology in the study. An ill-structured, real-world problem of food waste in the hotel service sector was presented to students (N = 72) and their accompanying teachers (N = 9) from second and tertiary education. They were provided with access to expert knowledge and opinion by industry professionals (N=5) on site. We collected data via observations, interviews, and questions from the involved stakeholders in three physical locations in Denmark and in Finland. Additionally, we documented their experiences using an online collaboration tool in each case. Despite the scaffolding provided by the business professionals, students underused the resources available for their learning in the extended learning environment. Students benefited from guided exploration of the problem space, structured feedback, and teacher interventions, resulting in improved perspective taking, participation, social regulation, task regulation and knowledge building.


Basadur, M., & Gelade, G. (2006). The role of knowledge management in the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 45–62. DOI:

Basadur, M., Gelade, G., & Basadur, T. (2014). Creative problem-solving process styles, cognitive work demands, and organizational adaptability. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(1), 80–115. DOI:

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35–52). Springer. DOI:

Bergmark, U. (2022). The role of action research in teachers’ efforts to develop research-based education in Sweden: Intentions, outcomes, and prerequisite conditions. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 427–444. DOI:

Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2018). Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: Validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS). Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(6), 1321–1338. DOI:

Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A. S. (1990). Workplace basics: The essential skills employers want. Jossey-Bass.

Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Chiu, B.-C., Liu, C.-C., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Wen, C.-T., Hwang, F.-K., Wu, Y.-T., Chao, P.-Y., Lai, C.-H., Wu, S.-W., Chang, C.-K., & Chen, W. (2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations. Computers & Education, 114, 222–235.

Chen, B. H., & Chiou, H.-H. (2014). Learning style, sense of community and learning effectiveness in hybrid learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 485–496. DOI:

Conley, D. T., & French, E. M. (2013). Student ownership of learning as a key component of college readiness. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(8), 1018–1034. DOI:

Fernández, M., Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2015). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 50(1), 54–72. DOI:

Escartín, J., Saldaña, O., Martín-Peña, J., Varela-Rey, A., Jiménez, Y., Vidal, T., & Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á. (2015). The impact of writing case studies: Benefits for students’ success and well-being. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 47–51. DOI:

Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2013). Validation study of a method for assessing complex ill-structured problem solving by using causal representations. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61(3), 443–463. DOI:

Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 121–162. DOI:

Garrone, P., Melacini, M., & Perego, A. (2014). Opening the black box of food waste reduction. Food Policy, 46, 129–139. DOI:

Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223. DOI:

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin. & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.

Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R., & Meybeck, A. (2011). Global food losses and food waste. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Haataja, E., Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E., Salonen, V., Laine, A., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2019). Teacher’s visual attention when scaffolding collabora¬tive mathematical problem solving. Teaching & Teacher Education, 86, 1–15. DOI:

O’Neil, H. F., Chuang. S.-H., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003) Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(3), 361–373. DOI:

Heikkilä, L., Reinikainen, A., Katajajuuri, J. M., Silvennoinen, K., & Hartikainen, H. (2016). Elements affecting food waste in the food service sector. Waste Management, 56, 446–453. DOI:

Helyer, R. (2015). Learning through reflection: The critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). Journal of Work-Applied Management, 7(1), 15–27. DOI:

Hesse, F., Care, E., Jürgen, B., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 37–56). DOI:

Jackson, D. (2018). Challenges and strategies for assessing student workplace performance during work-integrated learning. Assessment & Evaluation in higher Education, 43(4), 555–570. DOI:

Jackson, D. (2019). Student perceptions of the development of work readiness in Australian undergraduate programs. Journal of College Student Development, 60(2), 219–239. DOI:

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(1), 65–94. DOI:

Juvan, E., Grün, B., & Dolnicar, S. (2018). Biting off more than they can chew: Food waste at hotel breakfast buffets. Journal of Travel Research, 57(2), 232–242. DOI:

Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2013). “Nudging” hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win-win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 119(3), 325–327. DOI:

Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (1994). Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In J. G. Anderson, & C. E. Aydin (Eds.), Evaluating health care information systems: Methods and applications (pp. 45–68). Sage.

Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403–417. DOI:

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Collaborative learning and critical thinking: Testing the link. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 726–753. DOI:

Margolis, A. (2020). Zone of proximal development, scaffolding and teaching Practice. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16, 15–26. DOI:

Martin-Rios, C., Demen-Meier, C., Gössling, S., & Cornuz, C. (2018). Food waste management innovations in the foodservice industry. Waste Management, 79, 196–206. DOI:

McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 2, 149–162. DOI:

Nygren, H., Nissinen, K., Hämäläinen, R., & Wever, B. (2019). Lifelong learning: Formal, non‐formal and informal learning in the context of the use of problem‐solving skills in technology‐rich environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1759–1770. DOI:

Oliveira, B., Pinto de Moura, A., & Cunha, L. M. (2016). Reducing food waste in the food service sector as a way to promote public health and environmental sustainability. In W. Leal Filho, U. M. Azeiteiro, & F. Alves (Eds.), Climate change and health: Improving resilience and reducing risks (pp. 117–131). DOI:

Oliveri, M. E., Lawless, R., & Molloy, H. (2017), A literature review on collabora¬tive problem solving for college and workforce readiness. ETS Research Report Series, (1), 1–27. DOI:

Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2, 1–28. DOI:

Papargyropoulou, E., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N., Lozano, R., Padfield, R., & Ujang, Z. (2019). Patterns and causes of food waste in the hospitality and food service sector: Food waste prevention insights from Malaysia. Sustainability, 11(21), 1–21. DOI:

Pirani, S. I., & Arafat, H. A. (2016). Reduction of food waste generation in the hospitality industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 129–145. DOI:

Powell, P., & Walsh, A. (2018). Mutualising the university: Achieving community impact through an ecosystem. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 64(5), 563–583. DOI:

Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82–94. DOI:

Rojas-Drummond, S., José Barrera, M., Hernández, I., Alarcón, M., Hernández, J., & María Márquez, A. (2020). Exploring the “black box”: What happens in a dialogic classroom? Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 43(1), 47–67. DOI:

Sáez Bondía, M. J., & Cortés Gracia, A. L. (2022). Action research in education: A set of case studies? Educational Action Research, 30(5), 850–864. DOI:

Sáez, M. J., & Carretero, A. J. (1996). From action research to the classroom case-study: The history of ANTEC. Educational Action Research, 4(1), 29–46. DOI:

Sakaguchi, L., Pak, N., & Potts, M. D. (2018). Tackling the issue of food waste in restaurants: Options for measurement method, reduction and behavioral change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 430–436. DOI:

Stenmarck, Å., Jensen, C., Quested, T., Moates, G., Buksti, M., Cseh, B., & Östergren, K. (2016). Estimates of European food waste levels. (Fusions EU). IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.

Sommarström, K., Ruskovaara, E., & Pihkala, T. (2017). Company visits as an opportunity for entrepreneurial learning. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 10(3), 298–315. DOI:

Titus, P. A., & Koppitsch, S. (2018). Exploring business students’ creative problem-solving preferences. Journal of Education for Business, 93(5), 242–251. DOI:

Tomkins, L., & Ulus, E. (2015). Is narcissism undermining critical reflection in our business schools? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(4), 595–606. DOI:

Tynjälä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Hämäläinen, R. (2014). TEL@work: Toward integration of theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 990–1000. DOI:

Verenikina, I. (2012). Facilitating collaborative work in tertiary teaching: A self-study. Australian Educational Researcher, 39(4), 477–489. DOI:

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. DOI:

Wu, S.-Y. (2020). Incorporation of collaborative problem solving and cognitive tools to improve higher cognitive processing in online discussion environ-ments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 249–272. DOI:

Zheng, L., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2019). The effects of group metacognitive scaffolding on group metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. Internet & Hi gher Education, 42, 13–24. DOI:

Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(2), 5–22. DOI:

Xun, G., Law, V., & Kun, H. (2016). Detangling the interrelationships between self-regulation and ill-structured problem solving in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 86–98. DOI:

Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20, 134–152. DOI:




How to Cite

Halttunen, T., Dragin-Jensen, C., Kylänpää, C., & Karkov, A. (2023). Collaborative problem solving: A pedagogy for workplace relevance. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 13(2), 45–73.



Peer-reviewed research articles