Learning through collaboration between vocational teacher training institutions and workplaces: Barriers and contradictions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2212125Keywords:
Institution-workplace collaboration, contradictions, collaborative activities, action research, vocational pedagogyAbstract
In vocational education and training, the acquisition of relevant skills by learners is vital for their employability. It has been argued that institution–workplace collaboration facilitates this acquisition of relevant skills through availing authentic real-life learning situations. This study used the cultural–historical activity theory to identify and characterise challenges to learning through collaboration between a masters of vocational pedagogy (MVP) programme, vocational teacher training institutions and workplaces in Uganda. Data were obtained using in-depth individual interviews with purposively sampled actors in collaborative activities. The findings revealed that challenges manifesting as discursive contradictions occurred in different phases of implementing collaborative activities. In the planning and implementation phase, contradictions were linked to short time frames for collaborative activities, unsynchronised activity plans and contradictory working cultures. In the supervision of learning, contradictions arose from a lack of a common understanding of the objectives and work methods of the collaborative activities. A lack of feedback to actors, an absence of a collaboration focal person, and a lack of government policy limited participation in collaborative activities. These challenges were observed to lessen the focus on the MVP students’ learning, which ultimately affected the quality of work produced and interfered with the implementation of collaborative activities.References
Andersson, P., & Köpsén. S. (2019). VET teachers between school and working life: Boundary processes enabling continuing professional development. Journal of Education and Work, 32(6–7), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1673888
Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A sys-tematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Arinaitwe, D. (2021). Practices and strategies for enhancing learning through collaboration between vocational teacher training institutions and work-places. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00117-z
Arinaitwe, D., & Sannerud, A. R. (2019). Analysing the interplay between institutional-based and workplace learning. Scandinavian Journal of Vocations in Development, 4(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.3249
Batholmeus, P., & Pop, C. (2019). Enablers of work-integrated learning in technical vocational education and training teacher education. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20(2), 147–159.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Routledge.
Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage.
Bound, H. (2011). Vocational education and training teachers’ professional de-velopment: Tensions and context. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2011.554176
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of re-search methods in psychology (Vol. 2). Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Associa-tion. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Choy, S., Kemmis, R., & Green, A. (2016). Theorising partnerships for site-based education development in vocational education and workplace learn-ing. Education Action Research, 24(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1178155
Cohen, L., Manion, P., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Daneils, H., Leadbetter, J., Soares, A., & MacNab, N. (2007). Learning in and for cross-school working. Oxford Review of Education, 33(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701259469
Ellinger, A., & Cseh, M. (2007). Contextual factors influencing the facilitation of others’ learning through everyday work experiences. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(7), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/1366562071081938
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoret-ical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engeström, Y. (2015.). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive Learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Founda-tions, findings, and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradic-tions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Jour-nal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
Fjellström, M. (2014). Vocational education in practice: A study of work-based learning in a construction programme at a Swedish upper secondary school. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training. 6(2), 1–20. http://www.ervet-journal.com/content/6/1/2
Flynn, M. C., Pillay, H., & Watters, J. (2016). Industry-school partnerships: Boundary crossing to enable school to work transitions. Journal of Education and Work, 29(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.934789
Guimon, J. (2013). Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing coun-tries. World Bank. https://www.scribd.com/document/264806771/Promoting-University-Industry-Collaboration-in-Developing-Countries
Jackson, D., Fleming, J., & Rowe, A. (2019). Enabling the transfer of skills and knowledge across classroom and work contexts. Vocations and Learning, 12(3), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09224-1
Kalanda, E., Malenya, F., & Otiende, E. (2021). Systematic legislation a stimula-tion for meaningful inclusion of work-integrated learning in higher educa-tion curricula in Uganda. Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 11(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1101032438
Kitagaana, Z. (2018). Constraints to university-industry linkages in Uganda: Perceptions of dons at public university. African Journal of Education, Science, and Technology, 5(1), 140–149. https://ajest.info/index.php/ajest/article/view/603
Köpsén, S., & Andersson, P. (2018). Boundary process in connection with stu-dents’ workplace learning: Potentials for VET teachers’ continuing profes-sional development. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 8(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.188158
Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
Mårtensson, A., Andersson, P., & Nyström, S. (2019). A recruiter, a matchmak-er, a firefighter: Swedish vocational teachers’ relational work. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 9(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.199189
Maxwell, B. (2014). Improving workplace learning of lifelong learning sector trainee teachers in the UK. Journal of Further and higher Education, 38(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831036
Mgonja, C. (2017). Enhancing the university-industry collaboration in devel-oping countries through best practices. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 50(4), 216–225.
Mjelde, L., & Daly, R. (2012). Aspects of vocational pedagogy as practice: De-colonizing minds and negotiating local knowledge. International Journal of Training Research, 10(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.2012.10.1.43
Mikkonen, S., Pylvas, L., Nokelainen, P., & Postareff, L. (2017). Guiding work-place learning in vocational education and training: A literature review. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9(9), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-017-0053-4
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2012). Skilling Uganda: BTVET Strategic Plan 2012/13 to 2021/2. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/youthpol/en/equest.fileutils.dochandle?p_uploaded_file_id=153
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2019a). The technical vocational education and training (TVET) policy. https://www.education.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FINAL-TVET-POLICY_IMPLEMENTATION-STANDARDS_IMPLEMENTATION-GUIDELINES_19TH_MAY_2020.pdf
Ministry of Education and Sports. (2019b). The national teacher policy.
Mushemeza, E. (2016). Opportunities and challenges of academic staff in high-er education in Africa. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p236
Okello, B. (2011). 80 complexities and contradictions in technical and vocation-al education policy in Uganda. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 2(1), 180–194.
Okello, B. (2014). A history of technical education in Uganda 1877–2005. https://www.academia.edu/7320439/HISTORY_OFTECHNICAL_EDUCATION_IN_UGANDA
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Learning for jobs: Report of the OECD reviews of vocational education and training.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Pertuze, J., Calder, E., Greitzer, E., & Lucas, W. (2010). Best practices for indus-try-university collaboration. Mitsloan Management Review, 51(4), 82–90.
Rojewski, J. W. (2009). A conceptual framework for technical and vocational education and training. In R. Maclean, & D. Wilson (Eds.), International hand-book of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning (pp. 19–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_2
Rybnicek, R., & Konigsgruber, R. (2019). What makes industry-university col-laboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics, 89, 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6
Sá, C. M. (2013). Perspectives of industry’s engagement with African universities. African Association of Universities. http://www.heart-resources.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Report-on-University-Industry-Linkages.pdf
Said, A. (2018). Vocational teaching – Learning through the eyes of under-graduate vocational students in Malta: A qualitative exploratory study. In-ternational Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 5(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.5.1.3
Sannerud, A. R. (2019). Vocational pedagogy. In T. O. Halvorsen (Ed.), Sharing knowledge transforming societies (pp. 231–248). African Minds.
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
Sjöö, K., & Hellström, T. (2019). University–industry collaboration: A litera-ture review and synthesis. Industry and Higher Education, 33(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219829697
Tavakol, M., & Sandars, J. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part II. Medical Teacher, 36(10), 838–848. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.915297
Taylor, A. (2006). The challenges of partnership in school-to-work transition. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820600955716
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustain-able development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Af-fairs. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
Yin, K. R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dinavence Arinaitwe, Louise Mifsud, Habib Kato, Arne Ronny Sannerud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0.