Finnish VET representatives’ interpretations of inclusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.221231Keywords:
inclusion, equality, equity, vocational education and training, special supportAbstract
The purpose of this study was to learn about Finnish VET representatives’ perceptions of inclusion. Discussions and research on inclusion in education have mainly concentrated on the comprehensive school context, although vocational education and training (VET) students may have multiple, intersectional experiences of disadvantage. Our data included representatives (N=53) from five different Finnish VET sectors. Through semi-structured interviews, we investigated their interpretations of inclusion. We applied an abductive approach in our analytical process that followed the principles of qualitative content analysis. Our findings indicated that the definition of inclusion is ambiguous. At the administration level, inclusion was related to ideology, whereas teachers spoke about special education practices. Work-life representatives connected inclusion to the principles of communality, and students appreciated this understanding and individual solutions in their studying and workplace learning. This study supports the view of earlier studies and addresses a need for shared understanding and values to engage with inclusion in practice. The VET sector would benefit from discussions and training in inclusion and inclusive principles, where the study works as an initiator.
References
Arnesen, A.-L., & Lundahl, L. (2006). Still social and democratic? Inclusive edu-cation policies in the Nordic welfare states. Scandinavian Journal of Education-al Research, 50(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743316
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005055669
Beach, D., & Sernhede, O. (2011). From learning to labour to learning for mar-ginality: School segregation and marginalization in Swedish suburbs. Brit-ish Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.547310
Billett, S. (2014) The standing of vocational education: Sources of its societal esteem and implications for its enactment. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 66(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.867525
Björk-Åman, C., Holmgren, R., Pettersson, G., & Ström K. (2021). Nordic re-search on special needs education in upper secondary vocational education and training: A review. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2111197
Butina, M. (2015). A narrative approach to qualitative inquiry. Clinical Laborato-ry Science, 28(3), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.28.3.190
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1), 1–21.
Cavanagh, J., Meacham, H., Pariona Cabrera, P., & Bartram, T. (2019). Voca-tional learning for workers with intellectual disability: Interventions at two case study sites. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 71(3), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1578819
Cooley, A. 2013. Qualitative research in education: The origins, debates, and politics of creating knowledge. Educational Studies, 49(3), 247–262.
Ebuenyi, I., Rottenburg, E., Bunders-Aelen, J., & Reeger, B. (2020). Challenges of inclusion: A qualitative study exploring barriers and pathways to inclu-sion of persons with mental disabilities in technical and vocational educa-tion and training programmes in East Africa. Disability and rehabilitation, 42(4), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1503729
Finlex Data Bank. (1986). Act on equal opportunities. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1986/19860609
Finlex Data Bank (2014). Act on non-discrimination. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2014/20141325
Finlex Data Bank. (2017). Act on vocational education, 531/2017. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170531
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Fin-land. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From re-search design to analysis and publication. New York University Press.
Goman, J., Hievanen, R., Kiesi, J., Huhtanen, M., Vuojus, T., Eskola, S., Karvo-nen, S., Kullas-Norrgård, K., Lahtinen, T. Majanen, A., & Ristolainen, J. (2021). Special needs support as a resource: Evaluation of the provision of special needs support in vocational education and training. Finnish Educa-tion Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). https://karvi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/KARVI_1721.pdf
Göransson, K., & Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings: A critical analysis of research on inclusive education. Europe-an Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545.
Herranen, J., & Souto, A.-M. (2016). Vapaus valita toisin? Ammatillinen koulu-tus koulutusmyönteisten nuorten kunnianhimoisena valintana [Freedom to choose differently? VET as an ambitious choice of optimistic students]. In H. Silvennoinen, M. Kalalahti, & J. Varjo (Eds.), Koulutuksen tasa-arvon muuttu-vat merkitykset: Kasvatussosiologian vuosikirja 1 [Variable meanings of equality in education: Educational sociology yearbook 1] (pp. 195–226). Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura. Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 73. Jyväskylän yli-opistopaino.
Hewson, C. (2017). Research design and tools for online research. In N. Field-ing, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of online research method (pp. 57–75). SAGE Publications. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992.n4
Hinchman, K. A., & Moore, D. W. (2013). Close reading: A cautionary interpre-tation. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.163
Holm, G. (2018). Justice through education in the Nordic countries: Critical issues and perspectives. Education Inquiry, 9(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/20004508.2018.1429770
Jahnukainen, M. (2021) Erityisopetus ja oppivelvollisuus [Special education and compulsory school attendance]. In J. Säntti, A. Nevala, L. Kemppinen, A. Saari, S. Kotilainen, & K. Puranen-Impola (Eds.), Oppivelvollisuus 100 vuot-ta. [Compulsory education 100 years] (pp. 38–65). Koulu ja Menneisyys LVIII. Suomen kasvatuksen ja koulutuksen historian seuran vuosikirja 2021. Suomen kasvatuksen ja koulutuksen historian seura. https://doi.org/10.51811/km.100380
Jørgensen, C. H., Hautz, H., & Li, J. (2021). The role of vocational education and training in the integration of refugees in Austria, Denmark and Ger-many. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 8(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.8.3.2
Jørgensen, C. H., Olsen, O. J., & Persson Thunqvist, D. (Eds.). (2018). Vocational education in the Nordic countries: Learning from diversity. Routledge.
Kailaheimo-Lönnqvist, S., Kilpi-Jakonen, E., Niemelä, M., & Prix, I. (2020). Eriarvoisuus koulutuksessa [Inequality in education]. In M. Mattila (Ed.), Eriarvoisuuden tila Suomessa 2020 [The state of inequality in Finland] (pp. 93–125).
Kalevi Sorsa -säätiö. https://sorsafoundation.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Eriarvoisuus2020_web3.pdf
Karusaari, R. (2020). Asiakaslähtöisyys osaamisperusteisessa ammatillisessa koulu-tuksessa [Customer orientation in competence-based vocational education] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lapland]. Acta electronica Universita-tis Lapponiensis, 273.
Larsen, L., & Persson Thunqvist, D. (2018). Balancing the esteem of vocational education and social inclusion in four Nordic countries. In C. H. Jørgensen, O. J. Olsen, & D. Persson Thunqvist (Eds.), Vocational education in the Nordic countries: Learning from diversity (pp. 74–94). Routledge.
Lintuvuori, M. (2019). Perusopetuksen oppimisen ja koulunkäynnin tuen järjest-elmän kehitys tilastojen ja normien kuvaamana [Development of learning and schooling support system in Finnish basic education according to official statistics and norms] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Hel-sinki Studies in Education, 51.
Lundahl, L. (2016). Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631059
Niemi, A.-M. (2015). Erityisiä koulutuspolkuja? Tutkimus erityisopetuksen käytän-nöistä peruskoulun jälkeen [Special educational paths? A study on the practices of special needs education after basic education]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Studies in Educational Sciences, 264.
Nylund, M., & Rosvall, P.-Å. (2019). Vocational education, transitions, margin-alisation and social justice in the Nordic countries. European Educational Re-search Journal, 18(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119838893
Ouakrim-Soivio, N., Rautopuro, J., & Hildén, R. (2018). Shadows under the North Star: The inequality developing in Finnish school education. Nordi-dactica – Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 8(3), 65–86.
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
OECD. (2020). VET in a time of crisis: Building foundations for resilient vocational education and training systems. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=132_132718-fdwmrqsgmy&title=VET-in-a-time-of-crisis-Building-foundations-for-resilient-vocational-education-and-training-systems-&_ga=2.41124194.158592681.1632390483-1681738377.1623057783
Owal Group. (2021). Selvitys ammatillisen koulutuksen reformin toimeenpanosta [A report on VET reform implementation]. https://owalgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Reformin-toimeenpanon-tilanne_1603.pdf
Paju, B. (2021). An expanded conceptual and pedagogical model of inclusive collabora-tive teaching activities [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki].
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 8(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
Power, S. (2012). From redistribution to recognition to representation: Social injustice and the changing politics of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2012.735154
Qvortrup, A., & Qvortrup, L. (2018). Inclusion: Dimensions of inclusion in edu-cation. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7), 803–817. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13603116.2017.1412506
Raudasoja, A., & Ryökkynen, S. (n.d.). Inkluusio rakentuu yhteistyössä: Am-matillisiksi opettajiksi opiskelevien näkemykset lähtökohtana [Inclusion is constructed in collaboration: Professional teacher students’ views as the starting point of the study]. Unpublished.
Reindal, S. M. (2016). Discussing inclusive education: An inquiry into different interpretations and a search for ethical aspects of inclusion using the capa-bilities approach. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1087123
Rinehart, K. E. (2021). Abductive analysis in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 27(2), 303–311. https://doi.org10.1177/1077800420935912
Ryökkynen, S., Pirttimaa, R., & Kontu, E. (2020). Interaction between students and class teachers in vocational education and training: ‘Safety distance is needed’. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 9(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.1992156
Ryökkynen, S., Maunu, A., Pirttimaa, R., & Kontu, E. (2022). From the shade into the sun: Exploring pride and shame in students with special needs in Finnish VET. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(4), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1940006
Scharnhorst, U., & Kammermann, M. (2020). Who is included in VET, who not? Education + Training, 62(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2019-0248
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
Schmid, E. (2020). Upper secondary education for youth at risk: A comparative analysis of education and training programmes in Austria, Norway, Swe-den and Switzerland. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.1.2
State Auditor’s Office. (2021). Ammatillisen koulutuksen reformi [The reform of VET]. Valtiontalouden tarkastusviraston tarkastuskertomukset 2/2021. https://www.vtv.fi/app/uploads/2021/03/VTV-Tarkastus-2-2021-Ammatillisen-koulutuksen-reformi.pdf
Stenfert Kroese, B., Rose, J., Heer, K., & O’Brien, A. (2013). Gender issues for people with intellectual disabilities and mental health problems: Asking what service users and staff think. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-03-2013-0021
Stronks, K., Toebes, B., Hendriks, A., Ikram, U., & Venkatapuram, S. (2016). Social justice and human rights as a framework for addressing social determinants of health: Final report of the Task group on Equity, Equality and Human Rights. Re-view of social determinants of health and the health divide in the WHO European Region. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/334356/HR-task-report.pdf
Takala, M., Lakkala, S., & Äikäs, A. (2020). Inklusiivisen kasvatuksen monet mahdollisuudet [Many opportunities of inclusive education]. In M. Takala, A. Äikäs, & S. Lakkala (Eds.), Mahdoton inkluusio? Tunnista haasteet ja mah-dollisuudet [Impossible inclusion? Recognise challenges and opportunities] (pp. 13–44). PS-kustannus.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative re-search: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Tsagalidis, H., & Terning, M. (2018). A qualitative vocational education and training: Education for quantity or quality? Nordic Journal of Vocational Educa-tion and Training 8(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.1881114
UNESCO (1994). Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs edu-cation. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000098427
UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education.
UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2021). Technical and vocational education and training for dis-advantaged youth. https://unevoc.unesco.org/pub/tvet_for_disadvantaged_youth.pdf
Vehkasalo, V. (2020). Dropout prevention in vocational education: Evidence from Finnish register data. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 10(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2010281
Vuorinen, R., & Virolainen, M. (2017). Guidance in the new EU skills agenda and in the current EU framework for VET cooperation. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 19(1), 72–76.
Weigel, T., Mulder, M., & Collins, K. (2007). The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820601145549
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sanna Ryökkynen, Anu Raudasoja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0.