From gaps to transaction: Reflections on a long-term collaborative research practice in VET

Charlotte Wegener; Anja Overgaard Thomassen

doi:10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.24143185

Authors

Charlotte Wegener Aalborg University, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5600-7824
Anja Overgaard Thomassen Aalborg University, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-5502

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.24143185

Keywords:

collaborative research, pragmatism, social and health care education, transaction

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to reflect on and theorise collaborative research practices. Research–practice collaborations are widely recognised and encouraged by means of university strategies, policy intentions, and funding requirements. One way to provide for and strengthen collaborative research in education is to form long-term partnerships between schools and universities. In this reflective account, we draw on our own experiences from doing research in the field of vocational education and training (VET) as participants in a long-term collaboration among two social and health care vocational colleges and two university departments. Assisted by Dewey’s pragmatic approach to learning as transaction, we seek to move beyond the binary of ‘research’ and ‘practice’ as constituting a gap to be bridged between two forms of knowledge. Instead, we conceive of the collaboration as an emerging ‘third context’ in its own right created by various activities, all of which involve both theoretical and experiential knowledge.

References

Anand, A., Kringelum, L. B., Madsen, C. Ø., & Selivanovskikh, L. (2021). Interorganizational learning: A bibliometric review and research agenda. The Learning Organization, 28(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2020-0023

Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen, M. S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S., & O’Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002

Bjerregaard, T. (2009). Universities-industry collaboration strategies: A micro-level perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060910953951

Brix, J. (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.05.001

Burchert, J., Hoeve, A., & Kämäräinen, P. (2014). Interactive research on innovations in vocational education and training (VET): Lessons from Dutch and German cases. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.1.2.4

Choy, S., Kemmis, R. B., & Green, A. (2020). Theorising partnerships for site-based education development in vocational education and workplace learning. In C. Edwards-Groves, A. Olin, & G. Karlberg-Granlund (Eds.), Partnership and recognition in action research (pp. 18–36). Routledge.

Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Free Press.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath and Company.

Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (pp. 1–289). Southern Illinois University Press.

Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137032000102841

Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning: The ‘third way’. Management Learning, 35(4), 419–434. https://doi-org.zorac.aub.aau.dk/10.1177/1350507604048271

Elkjaer, B. (2018). Pragmatism: Learning as creative imagination. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … in their own words (2nd ed.) (pp. 66–82). Routledge.

Es-Sajjade, A. (2019). Developing alliance capability for strategic renewal. In A. Tuncdogan, A. Lindgreen, H. Volberda, & F. van den Bosch (Eds.), Strategic renewal: Core concepts, antecedents, and micro foundations (pp. 238–251). Routledge.

European Commission. (2024). Erasmus+: EU programme for education, training, youth and sport. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu

FoCUS. (2024). FOCUS: Forskningscenter for uddannelse på SOSU-området. https://sosuforskning.dk

Fritz, A. O. (2019), Second track to success. Journal of Behavioural Economics and Social Systems, 1(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.bess.v1i1.6450

Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., Anderson, E. R., Bohannon, A. X., Coburn, C. E., & Brown, S. L. (2022). Learning at the boundaries of research and practice: A framework for understanding research-practice partnerships. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211069073

Farrell C. C., Penuel W. R., Coburn C. E., Daniels J., & Steup L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships today: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.

Fuller, A., Halford, S., Lyle, K., Taylor, R., & Teglborg, A.-C. (2018). Innovating for a cause: The work and learning required to create a new approach to healthcare for homeless people. Journal of Education and Work, 31(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2018.1447654

Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2018). From initiatives to employee-driven innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(2), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2016-0085

Hargreaves, D. H. (1999) Revitalising educational research: Lessons from the past and proposals for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764990290207

Hiim, H. (2023). How can collaboration between schools and workplaces contribute to relevant vocational education? Vocations and Learning, 16, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-022-09300-z

Kelemen, M., & Hamilton, L. (2018). Creative processes of impact making: Advancing an American pragmatist methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-03-2017-1506

Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998), Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Li, J., & Pilz, M. (2023). International transfer of vocational education and training: A literature review. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(2), 185-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1847566

Mikkonen, S., Pylväs, L., Rintala, H., Nokelainen, P., & Postareff, L. (2017). Guiding workplace learning in vocational education and training: A literature review. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-017-0053-4

Mohajerzad, H., Martin, A., Christ, J., & Widany, S. (2021). Bridging the gap between science and practice: Research collaboration and the perception of research findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 790451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790451

Møller, B., Wegener, C., Rohwedder, A. B., Thomassen, A. O., & Dybdal, R. (2021). Uddannelse til ældrepleje: Et scoping review af læring i dansk social-og sundhedsuddannelse [Elderly care education: A scoping review of learning in Danish social and health care education]. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 11(2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2111291

Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557

Penuel W. R., Riedy R., Barber M. S., Peurach D. J., Le Bouef W. A., & Clark T. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infra-structure. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126

Phillips, W., Alexander, E., & Lee, H. (2019). Going it alone won’t work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3608-1

Randers Social- og Sundhedsskole. (2024). www.sosuranders.dk

Russ, E., Petrakis, M., Whitaker, L., Fitzroy, R., & Short, M. (2024). Co-operative inquiry: Qualitative methodology transforming research ‘about’ to research ‘with’ people. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241234272

Sappa, V., Aprea, C., & Vogt, B. (2018). Success factors for fostering the connection between learning in school and the workplace: The voice of Swiss VET actors. In S. Choy, G.-B. Wärvik, & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Integration of vocational education and training experience (pp. 303–325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5_16

SOSU Østjylland. (2024). www.sosuoj.dk

Styhre, A. (2022). Theorizing as a scholarly meaning-making practice: The value of pragmatist theory of theorizing. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 38(3), Article 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101215

Sydelko, P., Midgley, G., & Espinosa, A. (2021). Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: Creating a common, cross-agency understanding. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.045

Thomassen, A. O. (2009). Facilitated work based learning: Analyseret i et pragmatisk perspektiv [Facilitated work based learning: Analysed from a pragmatic perspective] [PhD dissertation, Aalborg University].

Thomassen, A. O. (2011). Den tredje kontekst: Integration af uddannelse og arbejde i virksomheder [The third context: Integration of education and work in companies]. In E. Laursen, & N. Stegeager (Eds.), Organisationer i bevægelse: Læring – udvikling – intervention [Organisations in movement: Learning – development – intervention] (pp. 119–131). Samfundslitteratur.

Thomassen, A. O. (2013). Facilitated work based learning: A new method for continuing education? In L. A. Wankel, & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Increasing student engagement and retention using mobile applications: Smartphones, Skype and texting technologies (pp. 271–296). Emerald.

Thomassen, A. O. (2024). University–industry collaborations as processual inter-organizational learning: Implications of the third context. Journal of Workplace Learning, 36(6), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2023-0123

Volberda, H. W., Khanagha, S., Baden-Fuller, C., Mihalache, O. R., & Birkinshaw, J. (2021). Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms. Long Range Planning, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102110

Wegener, C. (2021). Co-production as a research method: Reflections from a collaborative writing workshop. In A. O. Thomassen, & J. B. Jensen (Eds.), Processual perspectives on the co-production turn in public sector organizations (pp. 255–269). IGI global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4975-9.ch014

Wegener, C., Storm, M., & Willumsen, E. (2023). The nursing home as a hub: Boundary work as a key to community health promotion. Health Promotion International, 38(2), Article daad020. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad020