Evaluating labour market–educational programme fit: A case study on aligning supply and demand for competences using a generic approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.241441Keywords:
curriculum development, employability, graduates, Bloom, job ad analyticsAbstract
There is a long-standing debate within academia and practice on how specific educational programmes and educational systems, in general, prepare students for the labour market after graduation. This article contributes to this debate by exploring to what extend Bloom’s revised taxonomy (BRT) can be used to investigate the degree of alignment between the demand of the Danish labour market and the supply of competences. We present a generic method for evaluating labour market–educational programme fit that can be used across educational programmes. This method is developed and tested in a case study in which BRT is used to investigate the alignment between the curriculum and labour market demand for skills, knowledge, and compe-tences. We compare the curriculum of the multimedia design programme with relevant job advertisements. This comparison involves a qualitative analysis of both the programme’s learning goals and the advertisements’ content based on qualitative and abductive coding. We identify areas of misalignment and discuss how the educational programme can use the information to align the supply with the demand for competences.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed). Longman.
Barnett, R. (2012). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642841
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). Academic Press.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/168781408903300205
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans.
Boahin, P., Eggink, J., & Hofman, A. (2014). Competency-based training in international perspective: Comparing the implementation processes towards the achievement of employability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(6), 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.812680
Careerjet. (2022). Careerjet [Computer software]. https://www.careerjet.dk/
Collet, C., Hine, D., & du Plessis, K. (2015). Employability skills: Perspectives from a knowledge-intensive industry. Education + Training, 57(5), 532–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2014-0076
Daubney, K. (2021). “Teaching employability is not my job!”: Redefining embedded employability from within the higher education curriculum. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2020-0165
European Commission. (2022). ESCO European skills/competences, qualifications and occupations. https://ec.europa.eu/esco/portal
Ferris, T. L. J., & Aziz, S. (2005). A psychomotor skills extension to Bloom’s taxonomy of education objectives for engineering education. Exploring Innovation in Education and Research, Taiwan, 1–5 March 2005.
Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. University of Oklahoma. https://www.acousticslab.org/dots_sample/general/Fink2003SelfDirected.pdf
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Giridharan, B. (2020). Learning for a sustainable future: Developing key competencies. In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger, & T. Subhi Yamin (Eds.), Introduction to sustainable development leadership and strategies in higher education (Vol. 22, pp. 135–144). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000022013
Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1–15). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_1
Harper, R. (2012). The collection and analysis of job advertisements: A review of research methodology. Library and Information Research, 36(112), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg499
Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: Developing a framework for policy analysis (Research Brief No 85). Institute for employment studies, Department for Education and Employment.
Holmes, L. (2001). Reconsidering graduate employability: The ‘graduate identity’ approach. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320120060006
Hopmann, S., Künzli, R., & Jacobsen, B. W. (1995). Læseplansarbejdets muligheder og begrænsninger: Et grundrids af en læseplansteori [The possibilities and limitations of curriculum work: An outline of a curriculum theory]. In K. Schnack (Ed.), Didaktiske studier [Didactical studies] (Vol. 20, pp. 311–470). Danmarks Lærerhøjskole.
Irvine, J. (2021). Taxonomies in education: Overview, comparison, and future directions. Journal of Education and Development, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v5i2.898
Jackson, D. (2014). Testing a model of undergraduate competence in employ-ability skills and its implications for stakeholders. Journal of Education and Work, 27(2), 220–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.718750
Jobindex. (2022). Jobindex [Computer software]. https://www.jobindex.dk/
Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M. (2002). Employability through the curriculum. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021222629067
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Krause, K.-L. D. (2022). Vectors of change in higher education curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1764627
Kress, G. (2000). A curriculum for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640050005825
Kulkarni, V. A., Bewoor, A. K., Malathi, P., & Balapgol, B. S. (2017). Employability skill matrix for engineering graduates of tier-II institutes. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3). https://journaleet.in/articles/employability-skill-matrix-for-engineering-graduates-of-tier-ii-institutes
Lee, Y., & Sabharwal, M. (2016). Education–job match, salary, and job satisfaction across the public, non-profit, and for-profit sectors: Survey of recent college graduates. Public Management Review, 18(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.957342
Mahajan, R., Gupta, P., & Misra, R. (2022). Employability skills framework: A tripartite approach. Education + Training, 64(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2020-0367
Mathiasen, M. (2022). Jobtrend [Computer software]. https://www.research.baaa.dk/
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Olo, D., Correia, L., & Rego, C. (2021). How to develop higher education curricula towards employability? A multi-stakeholder approach. Education + Training, 64(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2020-0329
O’Neill, G., & Murphy, F. (2010). Guide to taxonomies of learning. University College Dublin. http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/ucdtla0034.pdf
Rios, J. A., Ling, G., Pugh, R., Becker, D., & Bacall, A. (2020). Identifying critical 21st-century skills for workplace success: A content analysis of job advertisements. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19890600
Rohrbach-Schmidt, D., & Tiemann, M. (2016). Educational (mis)match and skill utilization in Germany: Assessing the role of worker and job characteristics. Journal for Labour Market Research, 49(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-016-0198-9
Song, B. L., Lee, K. L., Liew, C. Y., Ho, R. C., & Lin, W. L. (2022). Business students’ perspectives on case method coaching for problem-based learning: Impacts on student engagement and learning performance in higher education. Education + Training, 64(3), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2021-0106
Stoyanova, S., & Yovkov, L. (2016). Educational objectives in e-learning. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 3(9), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0309002
Thurner, V., & Böttcher, A. (2020). Defining higher order learning objectives for software development that align with employability requirements. In M. E. Auer. & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), The challenges of the digital transformation in education (pp. 876–887). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_81
Wheelahan, L., & Moodie, G. (2021). Analysing micro-credentials in higher education: A Bernsteinian analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887358
Williams, S., Dodd, L. J., Steele, C., & Randall, R. (2016). A systematic review of current understandings of employability. Journal of Education and Work, 29(8), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1102210
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Felby, Jacob Nielsen, Anna Roesen, Morten Mathiasen, Sune Müller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0.