Praksisnærhed i erhvervsskolens naturfagsundervisning gennem betydende overgange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.14v4i1a7Keywords:
transfer of knowledge, practiceAbstract
Relation to practice in vocational science education through consequential transitions: Relation to practice is often used as a teaching principle in vocational science education. The principle is based on the assumption that it improves students’ possibilities to do a more effective transfer of knowledge between a school context and a context of professional practice. In the paper we deploy a sociocultural perspective to present a nuanced concept of practice that leads us to conceive transfer in terms of consequential transitions among practices. Relation to practice as a pedagogical principle should build on the clarity of which practices students are invited to participate in, and how teaching facilitates different consequential transitions among them.
References
Aarkrog, V. (2010). Fra teori til praksis : undervisning med fokus på transfer København: Munksgaard Danmark
Beach, K. (1999). Consequential Transitions: A Sociocultural Expedition beyond Transfer in Education. Review of Research in Education, 24(1999), 101-139. DOI: 10.2307/1167268
Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, Y. Engeström & M. Young (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39-62). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Danmarks Statistik. (2010). Danmark i tal 2010. København: Danmarks Statistik.
Donnelly, J. (2009). Vocationalism and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2225-254). DOI: 10.1080/03057260903142301
Eurydice/Eurostat. (2005). Key data on education in Europe 2005. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Eurydice/Eurostat. (2009). Key data on education in Europe 2009. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Kirschner, S. R., & Martin, J. (2010). The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice : mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609268
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science & Education, 12, 91-113. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022665519862
Leberman, S., McDonald, L., & Doyle, S. (2006). Transfer of Learning : Participants Perspectives of Adult Education and Training. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Sciencie Teaching, 38, 296-316. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
Lobato, J. (2006). Alternative Perspectives on the Transfer of Learning: History, Issues, and Challenges for Future Research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 431-449. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1504_1
Lynggaard, K. (2010). Dokumentanalyse. In S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder (pp. 137-152). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Macaulay, C. (2000). Transfer of learning. In V. E. Cree & C. Macaulay (Eds.), Transfer of learning in professional and vocational education (pp. 1-26). London: Routledge.
Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and Difference in Transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499-535. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263. DOI: 10.1177/13684310222225432
Roth, W.-M. (2008). The gap between university and the workplace: Examples from graphing in science. In O. Skovsmose, P. Valero & O. R. hristensen (Eds.), University Science and Mathematics Education in Transition (pp. 133-155). New York: Springer.
Schwartz, D. L., Brandsford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. 1-51: IAP.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project. An overview and key findings. Oslo: Oslo University.
Smardon, R. (2009). Sociocultural and cultural-historical frameworks for science education. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), The world of science education. Handbook of research in North America (pp. 15-26). Rotterdam: Sense.
Svejgaard, K. L. (2009). Erhvervsrelatering - en didaktisk udfordring i økonomifagene. In A. Lind (Ed.), Fagdidaktik i økonomifagene afsætning, virksomhedsøkonomi og international økonomi: Fællestræk og særpræg (pp. 6-12). København: Columbus.
Svejgaard, K. L. (2011). Udvikling af en anvendelsesorienteret og praksisnær naturfaglig undervisning på eud –med udgangspunkt i landbrugs- og sosuuddannelsen. Retrieved juni 2011, 2011, from http://fou.emu.dk/offentlig_show_projekt.do?id=162186
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003a). From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, Y. Engeström & M. Young (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 1-15). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003b). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Undervisningsministeriet. (2007). Bekendtgørelse om grundfag og centralt udarbejdede valgfag i erhvervsuddannelserne, BEK nr 882 af 06/07/2007.
Undervisningsministeriet. (2011). Bekendtgørelse af lov om erhvervsuddannelser, LBK 171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Paola Valero, Peer S. Daugbjerg, Karin Løvenskjold Svejgaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
From 2021 NJVET publishes all articles under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0.